• Home
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

The Researching Paralegal

~ Articles and Research for Legal Professionals

The Researching Paralegal

Author Archives: Celia C. Elwell, RP

E-Discovery Federal Rule Amendments and More.

06 Thursday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Bankruptcy Law, Case Law, Court Rules, Discovery, E-Discovery, Federal District Court Rules, Federal Law, Litigation, Mandatory Law, Metadata, Preservation, Primary Law, Regulations, Research, Sanctions, State Law, Statutes, Technology, The Sedona Conference, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on E-Discovery Federal Rule Amendments and More.

Tags

Bankruptcy Law, Case Summaries, E-Discovery, K&L Gates, Legal Research, Local Rules, Sedona Conference, State Court E-Discovery Rules

Category Archives: FEDERAL RULES AMENDMENTS, by Electronic Discovery, K&L Gates

http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/articles/federal-rules-amendments/

 Notice and analysis of electronic discovery federal rule amendments. You can count on this website to be updated promptly and the information and analysis is accurate. Free subscription by RSS feed.

While you are there, it is worth your time to browse the variety of information published by K&L Gates. They are experts on e-discovery. You will find, among other things:

  • E-Discovery Case Database <http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/e-discovery-case-database/>;
  • State Court Rules on E-Discovery <http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/state-district-court-rules/>; and
  • Case Summaries <http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/articles/case-summaries/>; and
  • Resources <http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/articles/resources/>.

Just poke around. I do not think you will be disappointed. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Federal Reserve and Banking Regulations.

06 Thursday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Federal Reserve System, Finance and Banking Law, Government

≈ Comments Off on Federal Reserve and Banking Regulations.

Tags

Banking Regulations, Federal Reserve, Foreclosure, Wall Street

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

http://www.federalreserve.gov/default.htm

 This site is about the Federal Reserve and banking regulations. The topics are divided as:

 Recent Developments, About the Fed, News and Events, Monetary Policy, Banking Information and Regulation, Payment Systems, Economic Research & Data, Consumer Information, Community Development, Reporting Forms, and Publications. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Whistleblower Comes Clean About Fake Classes for College Athletes.

04 Tuesday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in College Sport Research Institute, Employment Law, Intercollegiate Athletics, NCAA, Race Discrimination, Sports Law, Whistleblower

≈ Comments Off on Whistleblower Comes Clean About Fake Classes for College Athletes.

Tags

Basketball, BloombergBusinessweek, College Sport Research Institute, Football, Intercollegiate Athletics, NCAA Inc., Paul M. Barrett, Phony Courses, Politics and Policy, Recruiting Atheletes, Richard Southall, Sports Law, University of North Carolina, University of South Carolina, Whistleblower, William Friday

In Fake Classes Scandal, UNC Fails Its Athletes—and Whistle-Blower, by Paul M. Barrett, Politics and Policy, BloombergBusinessweek
http://tinyurl.com/m4g76ky

Sitting in Memorial Hall at the heart of the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina, Mary Willingham wondered what William Friday would want her to do. . . .

*     *     *

In his last decades he’d [William Friday] tried to stir discussion about whether commercialized intercollegiate athletics was distorting higher education. That’s why Willingham had approached Friday in his 92nd and final year. In private conversations, she’d told him about her mounting anxiety that rather than educating its recruited athletes, UNC was playing a shell game to keep them from needing to study at all. She’d told him about basketball and football stars who read at a grade school level. She confessed that she’d helped steer some of these young men—many of them black—into lecture classes that never met. Worst of all, given Carolina’s racial history, the phony courses were offered in the black studies department. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

International Resource Center at LLRX.com.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in International Law, International Law, International Law, Legal Directory, References, Research

≈ Comments Off on International Resource Center at LLRX.com.

Tags

beSpacific Blog., Comparative and Foreign Law, International Law Resource Center, LLRX.com, Sabrina I. Pacifici

Comparative and Foreign Law, International Law Resource Center, LLRX.com

http://www.llrx.com/comparative_and_foreign_law.html

My apologies. I should have thought of going directly to LLRX.com as one of the first places to look for a strong compilation of foreign law materials. If you are not already familiar with LLRX.com, then I strongly recommend that you make this a bookmark and visit it frequently.

Sabrina I. Pacifici is the genius behind this website. She is its founder, editor, and publisher. She also is the author of beSpacific Blog. < http://www.bespacific.com/> This is another blot add to your bookmarks. Ms. Pacifici is a well-recognized expert on legal research, and her work is consistently top notch. Again, both web sites are worth poking around. One never knows what other useful information may pop up. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Another Excellent Resource for Researching Foreign Law.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in International Law, International Law, International Law, References, Research

≈ Comments Off on Another Excellent Resource for Researching Foreign Law.

Tags

Foreign Jurisdictions, Mirela Roznovschi, New York University Library

Foreign Collections By Jurisdiction, by Mirela Roznovschi, Webmaster and Editor, New York University Library (last updated March 3, 2014)

http://tinyurl.com/mc2sl7w

This Library provides more foreign jurisdictions (countries) than previously posted at this blog. Please do not think of this resource as merely a place to find foreign jurisdiction. Poke around. “Quick Links” at the top of the page might be a good place to start. Sometimes I stumble over the most interesting things while I am looking for something else.

When researching foreign law, of course you can always use search engines such as Google and Bing. Instead, I recommend looking at law schools’ libraries and legal databases such as HG.org. For Heaven’s sake, please do not include Wikipedia in your search! -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Craig Ball On Being A Digital Forensic Witness.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Affidavits, Cross-Examination, Depositions, Direct Examination, Discovery, E-Discovery, Evidence, Exhibits, Expert Witness Report, Expert Witnesses, Experts, Forensic Expert Witness, Hearsay, Legal Technology, Legal Writing, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Craig Ball On Being A Digital Forensic Witness.

Tags

Affidavits, Ball In Your Court Blog, Craig Ball, Depositions, E-Discovery, Evidence, Expert Witness Report, Forensic Expert Witness, Trial Tips & Techniques

Becoming a Better Digital Forensics Witness, by Craig Ball, Ball In Your Court Blog

 http://tinyurl.com/kgm8epj

I love to testify—in court, at deposition, in declarations and affidavits—and I even like writing reports about my findings in forensic exams.

I love the challenge—the chance to mix it up with skilled interrogators, defend my opinions and help the decision makers hear what the electronic evidence tells us.  There is a compelling human drama being played out in those bits and bytes, and computer forensic examiners are the fortunate few who get to tell the story.  It’s our privilege to help the finders of fact understand the digital evidence.[1]

This post is written for computer forensic examiners and outlines ways to become a more effective witness and common pitfalls you can avoid.  But the advice offered applies as well to almost anyone who takes the stand. . . .

. . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Fifth Circuit Ignores Forensics Scandal.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Forensic Evidence, Mississippi Innocence Project

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Bite Marks, Kennedy Brewer, Levon Brooks, Louisiana, Medical Examiner, Michael West, Mississippi Innocence Project, National Association of Medical Examiners, Steven Hayne, Tavares Flaggs

The Fifth Circuit Turns Its Back on Forensics Scandal in Mississippi, by Radley Balko, The Washington Post, reposted in Forensic Magazine

http://tinyurl.com/m7b5hak

With a curt, three-page ruling late last month, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the post-conviction petition of Tavares Flaggs, a Mississippi man currently serving a life sentence for murder.

Flaggs was convicted in large part because of the testimony of Steven Hayne, a medical examiner who for about two decades was able to monopolize the autopsy business in Mississippi. This story should really be one of the bigger criminal justice scandals in recent U.S. history. It potentially affects thousands of cases, both criminal and civil. It involves wrongful convictions, and people let off who should be behind bars. Several of the people convicted based on flawed testimony from Hayne are still on death row, in both Mississippi and in Louisiana. Flaggs’ petition, filed by the Mississippi Innocence Project, was the most comprehensive summary of what happened in Mississippi yet to get before a federal court. The Fifth Circuit panel brushed it aside in just four paragraphs. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

New Mandatory Cover Sheet for U.S. District of Arizona.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, E-Filing, Local Rules, U.S. District Court of Arizona

≈ Comments Off on New Mandatory Cover Sheet for U.S. District of Arizona.

Tags

Civil Cover Sheet, E-Filing, ECF, Local Court Rules, Newsletter, U.S. District Court of Arizona

Notice of New, Automated Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), from Newsletter, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona

Effective Monday, March 3, 2014, it will be mandatory for registered users of ECF to complete the new, automated Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44) when opening a civil case.

This automated form allows for the entry of multiple party and attorney names, provides drop-down lists for many categories and radio buttons to select the appropriate Nature of Suit. The final version includes only the selected information, resulting in a clean, easy to read document.

The automated Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44) is located in the Forms section of our website or by clicking the link below. http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/forms/js-44-civil-cover-sheet

If you have questions about ECF, take advantage of the experience of others by browsing our Frequently-Asked Questions by clicking on the link below, or copy and paste into your browser: http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/faqs/ecf.

[Emphasis added.]

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

When a Collector Threatens You With Jail

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in In Custodia Legis

≈ Comments Off on When a Collector Threatens You With Jail

dowlinglawoffice's avatarBankruptcy Law Updates

There are two scenarios that I have seen where purported debt collectors have threatened people with jail.  One of them is an out and out scam.  The other is just illegal.  The scam is the most common so let’s start there.

  • Collector calls and tells you that if you don’t pay a certain bill immediately, the Sheriff is going to come to your house and arrest you.  You have to pay this today.  You are going to be arrested tomorrow.  The only way you can pay this is by electronic funds transfer from your checking account over the phone RIGHT NOW.  You cannot mail in a check — even a certified check sent next day delivery.  Nope.  It must be over the phone, straight from your checking account RIGHT NOW.

When was the last time a legitimate debt collector wouldn’t take a cashier’s check by mail?  They are so interested…

View original post 741 more words

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Canada’s Justice Laws Website.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Canada

≈ Comments Off on Canada’s Justice Laws Website.

Tags

Amendments Not In Force, Canada, Consolidated Acts, Constitutional Acts, Justice Laws Website, Regulations, Statutes, Table of Private Acts

Justice Laws Website

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/

If you are looking for Canadian law, this is a good place to start. This online source of Canada’s consolidated Acts and regulations is updated weekly. The site’s search engine provides basic and advanced search features. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Medicare Study of Injuries and Fatalities in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Health Law, Skilled Nursing Facilities, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

≈ Comments Off on Medicare Study of Injuries and Fatalities in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Tags

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Dr. Marty Makary, Inpatient, Inspector General, John Hopkins Hospital, Marshall Allen, Medicare, Medication Error, Nursing Homes, ProPublica, Sen. Bill Nelson, Skilled Nursing Facilities, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

One Third of Skilled Nursing Patients Harmed in Treatment, by Marshall Allen, ProPublica

http://tinyurl.com/kdrmeaz

A study by Medicare’s inspector general of skilled nursing facilities says nearly 22,000 patients were injured and more than 1,500 died in a single month — a higher rate of medical errors than hospitals. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Skype For Video Depositions?

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Court Rules, Depositions, Discovery, Employment Law, Federal District Court Rules, Federal Rules of Discovery, Video Deposition

≈ Comments Off on Skype For Video Depositions?

Tags

Bow Tie Law’s Blog, Deposition, Discovery Dispute, Federal Rule 26(g), Federal Rules of Discovery, Hernandez v. Hendrix Produce, Joshua Gilliland, Judge G.R. Smith, Meet and Confer, Skype, Video Deposition

“Stop and Think” About Skype for Depositions, by Joshua Gilliland, Bow Tie Law’s Blog

http://bowtielaw.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/another-skyping-judge/

Judge G.R. Smith issued a great reminder that lawyers must ‘stop and think’ when dealing with discovery disputes. This duty is imposed by Rule 26(g) and is ‘an affirmative duty to engage in pretrial discovery in a responsible manner that is consistent with the spirit and purposes of Rules 26 through Rule 37, and obligates each attorney to stop and think about the legitimacy of a discovery request, a response thereto, or an objection.’ Hernandez v. Hendrix Produce, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4837 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 9, 2014) citing Bottoms v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143251, 2011 WL 6181423 at * 4 (D. Colo. Dec. 13, 2011). 

The case at issue requiring lawyers to ‘stop and think’ involved the plaintiffs in a farmworker rights lawsuit. Three of the plaintiffs were in Mexico and unable to return to Georgia for their depositions. The Defendants wanted the depositions to be held in Georgia. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

From The Michigan Bar Journal, The True Meaning of “SS” And More.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Affidavits, Appellate Judges, Appellate Law, Disaster Preparedness, Document Retention, Family Law, Law Office Management, Legal Writing, Notary Jurat, Paternity

≈ Comments Off on From The Michigan Bar Journal, The True Meaning of “SS” And More.

Tags

2012 Revocation of Paternity Act, Appellate Practice Compendium, Audra McClure, Dana C. Livingston, JoAnn L. Hathaway, Michael J. Sullivan, Michigan Bar Journal, Notary Jurat, Phillip J. DeRosier, Plain Language Committee, Record Retention Policy, Spiritual Wellness, SS, Thomas Selden Edgerton

Michigan Bar Journal, 93 Mich. B. J. 2 (February 2014)

http://www.michbar.org/journal/home.cfm

In this post, I had planned to focus on only one article from the Michigan Bar Journal’s Plain Language Committee — “After Seven Centuries, the True Meaning of SS,” by Thomas Selden Edgerton. But, after seeing the quality of the other articles, I could not choose just one. So, here you will also find:

The 2012 Revocation of Paternity Act, by Audra McClure;

A Sound Record Retention Policy: A Matter of Self-Preservation, by Michael J. Sullivan and JoAnn L. Hathaway;

A Spiritual Focus Can Strengthen Wellness, by Molly Dean; and

Book Review: Appellate Practice Compendium, reviewed by Phillip J. DeRosier.

-CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Review of Paralegal Regulation in Ontario, Canada.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Canada, Canada Licensing, International Law, Paralegals/Legal Assistants

≈ Comments Off on Review of Paralegal Regulation in Ontario, Canada.

Tags

Access to Justice Act, Attorney General, David Morris, Law Society of Upper Canada, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Paralegal Licensing, Paralegal Regulation, Paralegals

Reports » Report of Appointee’s Five-Year Review of Paralegal Regulation in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General

http://tinyurl.com/mrw4olq

Paralegal regulation began in Ontario, Canada, on May 1, 2007 under the 2006 Access to Justice Act. The Act requires that all paralegals in Ontario shall be licensed by the Law Society of Upper Canada.

To verify that paralegal regulation under the Act was successful, the Act required two reviews after five years. This link will take you to both progress reports, submitted June 28, 2012 and November 1, 2012, respectively.

While visiting this link, I encourage you to poke around and learn more about the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario and Canadian law. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Oklahoma’s 2014 Official Citation Change – What Does it Mean?

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Citations, Legal Writing, Oklahoma Civil Appellate Procedure, Oklahoma Supreme Court, Public Domain Citations, Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act

≈ Comments Off on Oklahoma’s 2014 Official Citation Change – What Does it Mean?

Tags

Citing Legally Blog, National Reporter System, Neutral Citation, Oklahoma, Peter Martin, Public Domain Citation, Thomson Reuters, Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act

Oklahoma Makes It Official (But What Does That Signify?), by Peter Martin, Citing Legally Blog

http://citeblog.access-to-law.com/?p=107

For over 16 years Oklahoma appellate courts have attached non-proprietary, print-independent citation data to their decisions at the time of release, placed those decisions online at a public site, and required lawyers to cite state precedent using this contemporary system. Moreover, setting Oklahoma apart from other neutral citation pioneers, the judiciary staff applied neutral citations retrospectively to all prior decisions rendered during the print era, placed copies of them online as well, and encouraged but did not require that they also be cited by the new system.  Until this year, however, the print reports of the National Reporter System remained the “official” version of Oklahoma decisions.  As of January 1, 2014, sixty years after the Oklahoma Supreme Court designated the West Publishing Company as the ‘official publisher’ of its decisions, it revoked that designation. 

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Attorney Who Introduces Drug Evidence May Face Criminal Charges.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Drug Possession

≈ Comments Off on Attorney Who Introduces Drug Evidence May Face Criminal Charges.

Tags

Criminal Law, Drug Evidence, Drug Paraphernalia, Drug Possession, Judge Donald E. Machen, Law Enforcement, Lt. Leo O'Neill, Paula Reed Ward, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Wendy L. Williams

Attorney May Face Charges After Introducing Drug Evidence, by Paula Reed Ward, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

http://tinyurl.com/pdcyn6c

A Pittsburgh defense attorney could be facing criminal charges after she introduced potential drug evidence — a box containing a straw with suspected heroin residue — at a court hearing on Thursday.

Wendy L. Williams was instructed by Common Pleas Judge Donald E. Machen to get an attorney as Allegheny County sheriff’s deputies are now investigating the incident.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Lawyers — First Impressions Stick!

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Closing Argument, Cross-Examination, Direct Examination, Exhibits, Experts, Jury Persuasion, Jury Selection, Litigation, Making Objections, Mock Trials, Opening Argument, Plaintiff's Counsel, Trial Tips and Techniques, Voir Dire, Witnesses

≈ Comments Off on Lawyers — First Impressions Stick!

Tags

Bad Impressions, Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm, First Impressions, Mock Trials, Persuasive Litigator Blog, Trial Tips & Techniques, Visual Images, Witnesses

Expect First Impressions to be Carved in Stone, by Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm, Persuasive Litigator Blog

http://tinyurl.com/org7why

Please note additional links on first impressions, overcoming bad impressions, and using visual images to create a first impression at the bottom of this post at the Persuasive Litigator website. -CCE

We’ve all heard the old saying: You never get a second chance to make a first impression. It is true that when meeting someone new, our brain is quickly putting them into a number of categories. Their background, intelligence, friendliness, attitudes, trustworthiness, and a myriad of other aspects of character are all on their way to being locked into some pretty durable assumptions. In a legal setting, where a juror is reacting to a witness on the stand for example, we might want those credibility determinations to be made over time, informed by the full scope of the testimony. But don’t count on it. . . . 

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Google Mistrials – A Continuing Problem.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Internet, Juror Impeachment, Jury Instructions, Mistrials, Research, Rule 606, Trial Tips and Techniques, Verdict

≈ Comments Off on Google Mistrials – A Continuing Problem.

Tags

Bob Kalinowski, citizensvoice.com, Colin Miller, Eastern District of North Carolina, EvidenceProg Blog, Federal Rules of Evidence, Google Mistrial, Juror Impeachment, Jury instructions, Jury Trials, Litigation, Mistrials, Rule 606(b)

Stealing the Verdict: Eastern District of North Carolina Allows Jury Impeachment Regarding Internet Research, by Colin Miller, EvidenceProg Blog

http://tinyurl.com/mkk48a8

“Google mistrials” have been a problem for some time. Here are two examples – one in 2014 and another in 2011 — in which a juror used Internet legal research during the trial and discussed it with fellow jurors, causing a mistrial. -CCE

An emerging problem in the American justice system is jurors conducting internet research about a case, leading to the Google mistrial. And, when such research is not discovered until after trial, as in United States v. LaRoque, 2014 WL 683729 (E.D.N.C. 2012), it leads to jury impeachment.

 Mistrial by Internet A Growing Concern, By Bob Kalinowski (Staff Writer), citizensvoice.com

 http://tinyurl.com/mge3nqk

Legal experts have coined them ‘Google mistrials.’

Curious jurors seeking to conduct their own research surf the Internet about facts presented in court, bringing a halt to important court cases and tainting the outcome.

Sometimes it’s done unwittingly. Other times it’s done against a judge’s specific directions.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Can A Prisoner Get An Expert Witness Under Federal Rule 706 For His Medical Condition?

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 706, Summary judgment

≈ Comments Off on Can A Prisoner Get An Expert Witness Under Federal Rule 706 For His Medical Condition?

Tags

11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Alabama, Colin Miller, EvidenceProf Blog, Expert Witness, Federal Rules of Evidence, Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services, Hepatitis C, Prisoner, Rule 706, Summary judgment

Is There a Doctor in the House?: 11th Circuit Remands After Lower Court’s Erroneous Rule 706 Ruling, posted by Colin Miller, EvidenceProf Blog

http://tinyurl.com/n57dzzo

This post discusses an Alabama District Court’s and 11th Circuit Court of Appeal’s interpretation of Rule 706(a) of the Federal Rule of Evidence in a prisoner’s lawsuit in which he claims that he has Hepatitis C, his illness is not being treated and, without treatment, he will become sicker and die. -CCE

Federal Rule of Evidence 706(a) provides that:

On a party’s motion or on its own, the court may order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed and may ask the parties to submit nominations. The court may appoint any expert that the parties agree on and any of its own choosing. But the court may only appoint someone who consents to act.

As you can see from the language of Rule 706(a), there is nothing in the Rule’s text limiting expert appointment to either criminal or civil cases. So where did that leave the plaintiff in Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services, 2014 WL 701575 (11th Cir. 2014)?

 

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Updated Foreign Law Research Primer.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Australia, Brazil, Case Law, China, Citations, Egypt, Eritrea, France, Hong Kong, India, International Law, International Law, Israel, Law Journals, Law Libraries, Lebanon, Legal Directories, Legal Encyclopedia, Mandatory Law, Primary Law, References, Regulations, Research, Russia, Sweden, United Kingdom

≈ Comments Off on Updated Foreign Law Research Primer.

Tags

Australia, Brazil, China, Donna Sokol, Egypt, Eritrea, Foreign Law, France, Hong Kong, In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress, India, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Russia, Sweden, United Kingdom

Foreign and International Legal Research Guides – Pic of the Week, by Donna Sokol, In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress

http://tinyurl.com/opqzrpr

Don’t let the title “Pic of the Week” fool you. This is an updated legal research guide for fourteen foreign jurisdictions:  Australia; Brazil; United Kingdom; China; Egypt; Eritrea; France; Hong Kong; India; Israel; Japan; Lebanon; Russia; and Sweden.  It links to these countries’ reference sources, compilations, citations guides, periodicals (indexes and databases), dictionaries, web resources, free public web sites, subscription-based services, subject-specific web sites, and country overviews. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

HIPAA’s Omnibus Final Rule – Revise Your Procedures!

27 Thursday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Final Omnibus Rule, Government, Health Law, HIPAA, Law Office Management, Legal Malpractice, Office Procedures

≈ Comments Off on HIPAA’s Omnibus Final Rule – Revise Your Procedures!

Tags

Business Associate, Civil Fines, HIPAA, HIPAA privacy policies, HIPPA Final Omnibus Rule, HITECH Act, Individually-Identifiable Health Information, Legal Malpractice, PHI, State Bar Discipline, The San Diego County Bar Association

Ethics in Brief – HIPAA Omnibus Final Rule: One Year Anniversary and Impact on Attorneys as Business Associates, by Linda Hunt Mullany, Ofer Barley, and Charles Berwanger, of Gordon & Rees LLP, for Ihe San Diego County Bar Association

https://www.sdcba.org/index.cfm?pg=Ethics-in-Brief-2-3-2014

January 25, 2014 marks the one year anniversary of the publication of the long-awaited omnibus final rule (“Final Rule”) by the Office of Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OCR”).  The Final Rule implemented many proposed regulations, and addressed other provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) in accordance with the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”).  This article addresses the most pertinent changes affecting attorneys as business associates who receive protected health information (“PHI”) from a covered entity.  Please note that additional requirements by state-specific privacy laws may apply.    

*     *     *

What This Means to Attorneys as Business Associates Going Forward
The extension of the covered entity’s responsibilities to business associates now brings possible civil and criminal liability to the forefront.  HIPAA civil fines for noncompliance can be up to $50,000 per violation (or a maximum of $1.5 million for repeated violations) depending on the degree of culpability, and criminal penalties may result in up to ten years in prison.  When combined with state penalties, these numbers may be even higher, and land an unwary attorney with front-page publicity of the wrong kind.  Anyone can file a complaint with the OCR if he or she believes that a violation occurred since the complainant need not be an actual victim.  The federal government will then decide whether to investigate and impose a fine or penalty.  Separately, noncompliance may also involve state bar discipline for attorney misconduct or causes for legal malpractice and, in California, individual patients can bring private lawsuits when their PHI has been negligently released in violation of state law.

Attorneys as business associates must immediately comply with the HIPAA Security and Privacy Rules.  That means that they will need to conduct a security risk assessment and draft a security policy for handling client electronic files that contain PHI.  Further, attorneys will need to implement HIPAA privacy policies regarding the use, disclosure, maintenance and destruction of PHI in any form.  Finally, if attorneys have not done so already, they are advised to audit their existing BAAs and come into compliance with the updated provisions, especially if they use subcontractors.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

What’s All the Fuss Over A Serial Comma?

26 Wednesday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Bad Legal Writing, Legal Writing

≈ Comments Off on What’s All the Fuss Over A Serial Comma?

Tags

Good Legal Writing Blog, John Hightower, People v. Walsh, Seiral Comma, Susan Hankin, Tiffany Johnson, University of Maryland Law School

The Case for the Serial Comma, by Tiffany Johnson, Good Legal Writing Blog

http://goodlegalwriting.com/2011/09/13/the-case-for-the-serial-comma/

I am a HUGE fan of the serial comma in most instances (especially in legal writing).  In this article, Susan Hankin at the University of Maryland Law School uses the reasoning of New York’s People v.Walsh to make a solid case for keeping that critical comma. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Arizona Anti-Gay Bill Vetoed.

26 Wednesday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Employment Law, Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection, Gender Discrimination, Government, Hostile Work Environment

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Anti-Gay Bill, Arizona, Center for Arizona Policy, Discrimination, Gender Discrimination, Governor Jan Brewer, Jeff Flake, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Religious Liberty, Secretary of State John Kerry, Senate Bill 1062, Super Bowl

Arizona Governor Vetoes  Anti-Gay Bill, by Dan Nowicki, Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, and Alia Beard Rau, The Arizona Republic, USA Today

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/26/arizona-governor-vetoes-anti-gay-bill/5849187/

It will be interesting to see how Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s veto will affect similar legislation in other states, such as Oklahoma, Idaho, and Kansas, and if the pressure from businesses and the public have not already done so. -CCE

Facing intense pressure from political and business interests and a growing public outcry, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer announced Wednesday that she had vetoed a bill that would have allowed businesses to refuse service to gays and others based on religious beliefs.

Brewer said the bill was unnecessary legislation that threatened the state’s recovering economy by driving away high-profile events such as next year’s Super Bowl and corporations looking to relocate to Arizona.

“Religious liberty is a core American and Arizona value — so is non-discrimination,” Brewer said at a news conference announcing the veto.  She said the proposed law, known as Senate Bill 1062, was too broadly worded and could have resulted in “unintended and negative consequences.” . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Litigator’s Self-Assessment Legal Writing Test.

24 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Bad Legal Writing, Brief Writing, Legal Writing, Legalese, Litigation, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Litigator’s Self-Assessment Legal Writing Test.

Tags

Above the Law (blog), Comes Now, Hereinafter, Litigator's Self-Assessment Test, Mark Herrmann, Raymond Ward, the (new) legal writer blog, Thereof

Are You A Crappy Litigator? A Self-Assessment Test! by Mark Herrmann, Above The Law Blog (with hat tip to Raymond Ward at the (new) legal writer blog!)

http://abovethelaw.com/2014/02/are-you-a-crappy-litigator-a-self-assessment-test/

Not exactly the words I would choose to make the point, but I agree that the emphasis on short, clear sentences and paragraphs is more persuasive. -CCE

It’s so hard to judge yourself.

Deep in your soul you know that people who criticize you are idiots, and people who praise you are wise and sagacious.

How can you possibly tell if you’re any good at what you do?

I have the answer for you! I’ve created a litigators’ self-assessment test! Now you’ll know if you’re any good!

Here’s how it works: Take out the last brief you filed.

Do it. Now. You won’t learn anything if you don’t follow the rules. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Apple Fixes NSA Encryption Security Flaw.

24 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Apple, Apps, Cell Phones, Encryption, iPad, iPhones, Legal Technology

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

1Password app, AgileBits, Apple, Daring Fireball, Edward Snowden, Encryption, iOS 7.0.4, iOS 7.0.5, iOS 7.0.6, iPhone J.D. Blog, Jeff Goldberg, Jeff Richardson, John Gruber, NSA, PRISM Documents, Security Updates

Apple Fixes Security Flaw In iOS, Perhaps Thanks To Snowden?, by Jeff Richardson, iPhone J.D. Blog

http://tinyurl.com/lmnrlvr

Apple releases minor security updates for the iPhone and iPad from time to time.  When folks ask me if they should upgrade, I virtually always say yes.  Why not have an iPhone that is more secure, and less likely to be hacked by bad guys?  So this past Friday afternoon when Apple released iOS 7.0.6 and said that it was a security update, I updated my devices but otherwise did not think much of it.  (And no, you did not miss an update if, like me, you went from iOS 7.0.4 to 7.0.6; 7.0.5 was only released for iPhones sold in China.)

But over the weekend, there were two posts about this update by John Gruber of Daring Fireball (Post 1, Post 2) that I thought were pretty interesting.  According to PRISM documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the NSA gained the ability to intercept encrypted iPhone traffic in October of 2012, and that’s apparently right after the bug fixed by iOS 7.0.6 was introduced.  As Gruber notes, this could mean all sorts of things.  It could mean that someone at Apple intentionally added a backdoor for the NSA.  Or it could mean that someone at Apple made a simple coding mistake but the NSA found out about it and exploited it.

Or it could just be a big coincidence, but there is at least a chance that Apple has now found and fixed a security bug that had been exploited by the NSA. . . .

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →
Follow The Researching Paralegal on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Sign In/Register

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Archives

  • June 2024
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Join 460 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d