• Home
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

The Researching Paralegal

~ Articles and Research for Legal Professionals

The Researching Paralegal

Monthly Archives: January 2014

View WordPerfect on iPhones and Ipads With LawBox’s WPD Viewer App.

30 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Apps, Cell Phones, iPad, iPhones, Legal Technology, Microsoft Office, Word, WordPerfect

≈ Comments Off on View WordPerfect on iPhones and Ipads With LawBox’s WPD Viewer App.

Tags

Charles Jannace, Corel, iOS7, iPhone J.D. Blog, Jeff Richardson, LawBox, Nicholas Zeltzer, Word, WordPerfect, WPD Viewer

WordPerfect Viewer returns to LawBox, by Jeff Richardson, iPhone J.D. Blog

http://tinyurl.com/m2mprrf

If you have an iPad or iPhone, you know that your device cannot natively view WordPerfect files. (Yes, there are still plenty of folks in the legal community who use WordPerfect.)

There is an app for that — WPD Viewer — originally reviewed by Jeff Richardson in 2010. Created by LawBox, this app will let you view a WordPerfect document, but you cannot edit it. Regardless, you can cut and paste into a new document if you wish to edit it.

The folks at Corel liked the app so much that they bought the right to sell it. As of January 2014, the app has come back to LawBox. The founder of LawBox, Nicholas Zeltzer, has already updated the app for iOS7. One of the post’s commenters, Charles Jannace, added that the app connects directly with Dropbox.

Although this app does not give you a smooth transition from WordPerfect to Word or back again, it does give you a way to access and copy and paste a WordPerfect document. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Free App to Access PACER on iPhones and iPads.

30 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Apps, Bankruptcy Law, Cell Phones, Dockets, E-Filing, Federal District Court Rules, Federal Law, iPad, iPhones, Legal Technology, PACER, Trial Tips and Techniques, U.S. Courts of Appeal

≈ Comments Off on Free App to Access PACER on iPhones and iPads.

Tags

Bankruptcy Court, Docket, Federal Court, iPads, iPhone J.D. Blog, iPhones, Jeff Richardson, Matthew Zorn, PACER

Review: DkT — access PACER on the iPad and iPhone, by Jeff Richardson, iPhone J.D. Blog

http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2014/01/review-dkt-pacer.html

Jeff reviews a free app created by Matthew Zorn called “DkT.” In this post, Jeff leads you through the various steps to use this app. Because this is the first version, no doubt Matthew will tweak it as time goes by. Regardless of its minor flaws, if you practice in federal court, this is an incredibly useful tool for your iPad or iPhone. -CCE

If you ever practice in federal court, then using PACER is a part of your job.  PACER websites typically let you select a mobile option so that you can access PACER on an iPad or an iPhone, but the experience isn’t ideal.  You cannot save your username or password, it is difficult to manually enter case numbers, and every time you access a docket sheet or a document you have to pay to do so.  Matthew Zorn, an attorney at a large New York law firm, decided to do something about that, so he spent nine months writing a useful and beautifully designed app that he calls DkT.  The DkT app is free and can access PACER for federal appellate, district and bankruptcy courts.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Do You Know Whether Your Judge Uses an iPad or Tablet? Find Out Before You Submit Your Next Brief.

28 Tuesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Apple, Brief Writing, Footnotes, iPad, Judges, Legal Technology, Legal Writing, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Do You Know Whether Your Judge Uses an iPad or Tablet? Find Out Before You Submit Your Next Brief.

Tags

Columbia Business Law Review, Daniel Sockwell, Eugene Volokh, iPad, Matthew Butterick, Typography for Lawyers

Writing a Brief for the iPad Judge, by Daniel Sockwell, Columbia Business Law Review

http://cblr.columbia.edu/archives/12940

‘Know your audience’ is a fundamental rule of skillful writing. For lawyers writing briefs in the 21st century, a key part of knowing your judicial audience is knowing what device will display your brief. While some judges print briefs and read the hard copy, a quiet revolution is occurring: more and more judges are reading briefs primarily on iPads or other tablets. According to experts on legal writing, this change in reading should trigger a similarly significant change in writing.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Recent Rule Amendments by Arizona Supreme Court.

27 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Advertising, Arizona Supreme Court, Continuing Legal Education, Criminal Law, Legal Ethics

≈ Comments Off on Recent Rule Amendments by Arizona Supreme Court.

Tags

Advertising, Arizona Attorney Magazine, Limited Scope Representation, MCLE, Patricia Sallen, Post-Conviction Disclosure, State Bar of Arizona, Supreme Court of Arizona

Other Arizona Rule Amendments, by Patricia Sallen, Arizona Attorney Magazine|State Bar of Arizona

http://tinyurl.com/o9vq6rh

In addition to adding the new mechanism to ER 1.15, the Supreme Court also recently made other significant ethics and practice-related rule amendments.

 

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Texas Federal Court Holds That Intrastate Truck Drivers Are Eligible for Overtime.

27 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, Litigation, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Texas Federal Court Holds That Intrastate Truck Drivers Are Eligible for Overtime.

Tags

Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, Interstate, Intrastate, Motor Carriers, Overtime, Technical Corrections Act, Truck Drivers, Wage and Hour Law

Federal Court Finds Intrastate Truck Drivers Eligible For Overtime Pay, by Andrew Iwata, Lawyer Up Blog

http://tinyurl.com/mkem29j

In Butcher v. TSWS d/b/a Pot-O-Gold, (S.D. Tex. August 25, 2011), the Southern District of Texas denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment in a case involving FLSA overtime claims brought by truck drivers.  The employer argued that the plaintiffs were subject to the FLSA’s motor carrier exemption (which would mean that the drivers were not entitled to overtime pay) because the plaintiffs work affected the safety of interstate transportation.  Although the plaintiffs never crossed state lines in driving their trucks for the defendant, the company claimed that the employees could have been called upon to drive interstate at any time.  The court acknowledged that under Songer v. Dillon Resources, 618 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2010), an intrastate driver may be exempt during periods when the driver ‘could have been called upon’ to drive interstate at any time.  The court acknowledged that under Songer v. Dillon Resources, 618 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2010), an intrastate driver may be exempt during periods when the driver “could have been called upon” to drive interstate.

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

FDA Documents Reveal Its Inadequate Response to High Risk Antibiotics in Livestock.

27 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Freedom of Information Act, Government, Health Law, U.S. Department of Food and Drug Administration

≈ Comments Off on FDA Documents Reveal Its Inadequate Response to High Risk Antibiotics in Livestock.

Tags

Andrew Martin, Antibiotic Resistance, Antibiotics, Bloomberg Businessweek, Farm Animals, FDA, Freedom of Information Act, Livestock, Natural Resources Defense Council, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The FDA Allows Sale of ‘High Risk’ Antibiotics for Livestock, Report Says, by Andrew Martin, Bloomberg Businessweek

 http://tinyurl.com/lsbntp3

There are hyperlinks throughout the article to additional blog posts that shed more light on the world-wide scope of this situation. -CCE

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration review of 30 antibiotics used in livestock found that more than half posed a significant risk of exposing humans to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Despite the review, which occurred from 2001 to 2010, the federal agency allowed the drugs—used as additives in animal feed and water—to remain on the market, according to a report released on Monday by the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that based its findings on internal documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Court Splits on Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

27 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Damages, Health Law, Litigation, Massachusetts Supreme Court, Medical Malpractice, Torts, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Court Splits on Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

Tags

Bystander Liability, Damages, Emotional Distress, Impact Rule, Medical Malpractice, Neglience, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Toney v. Chester County Hospital, Tort, Zone of Impact Liability

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Splits On Extension of Tort of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, by Daniel E. Cummins, TORT TALK Blog

http://tinyurl.com/mr4matq

The recent December 22, 2011 split decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the long-anticipated Opinion in the case of Toney v. Chester County Hospital, 2011 WL 6413948 (Pa. Dec. 22, 2011)(Baer, Todd, and McCaffery, JJ. join in support of affirmance)(Castille, Saylor, Eakin, JJ. join in support of reversal)(Orie Melvin, J. not participating) serves to fuel an argument in favor of the extension of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED).

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Excellent Case on Document Retention Policies and Litigation Holds.

26 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in E-Discovery, Hearsay, Judges, Legal Technology, Litigation, Litigation Hold, Preservation, Sanctions, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Excellent Case on Document Retention Policies and Litigation Holds.

Tags

Asbestos Insurance Coverage Litigation, Document Retention Policy, E-Discovery, Hearsay, Judge Paul Grimm, Litigation Hold, Sanctions, State of Mind Execption

No Sanctions for Following Records Retention Policy, by Joshua Gilliland, Esq., Bow Tie’s Law Blog

http://tinyurl.com/opq4t3t

It is not every day you see lawsuits about insurance policies from 1986 to 1987.

Add Judge Paul Grimm’s powerhouse footnotes and you get a great lesson in document retention policies and litigation holds (plus a great footnote on the state of mind exception to hearsay for all the evidence fans).

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Rethink Calling Your Clients “Toothless Cooties.”

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Legal Ethics, Litigation, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Rethink Calling Your Clients “Toothless Cooties.”

Tags

Case Evaluation, Client Communication, Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm, Legal Ethics, Litigation, Persuasive Litigator Blog, Trial Tips & Techniques

Criticize Clients Carefully, by Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm, Persuasive Litigator Blog

http://tinyurl.com/mg4bbue

Please note additional articles on client communication and relations at the end of the article. – CCE

There is no doubt that it’s a litigator’s job to realistically assess the case and, when the situation demands it, to deliver bad news to the client. How that assessment is crafted and communicated, however, is where the care comes in.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

2014 Amendments to Oklahoma’s Workers’ Compensation Court Rules.

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Court Rules, Oklahoma Supreme Court, Workers' Compensation

≈ Comments Off on 2014 Amendments to Oklahoma’s Workers’ Compensation Court Rules.

Tags

2014 Amendments, Court Rules, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, Workers' Compensation Court

In Re Court Rules Of The Workers’ Compensation Court, 2014 OK 2, Decided January 16, 2014, Corrected January 17, 2014, published by the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.

http://tinyurl.com/l7anrkw

Please note that the 2014 amendments to Oklahoma’s Workers’ Compensation Court Rules are not effective until January 31, 2014. –CCE

The Court Rules of the Workers’ Compensation Court as amended and approved by that Court on December 20, 2013, having been submitted to this Court for its consideration, are hereby approved. The rules are for official publication and shall become effective on January 31, 2014. The rules as amended shall be published in the Oklahoma Bar Journal three times. By today’s adoption of these rules, submitted by the Workers’ Compensation Court, this Court neither indicates what meaning should be ascribed to them in any given application nor settles their validity against challenges that may be launched on constitutional or statutory grounds, federal or state.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Proper Punctuation Matters, Especially When Drafting Contracts.

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, Contract Law, Legal Writing

≈ Comments Off on Proper Punctuation Matters, Especially When Drafting Contracts.

Tags

Adams On Contract Drafting Blog, American International Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., How Things Work, Julia Layton, Ken Adams, Legal Writing, Punctuation, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

My Forthcoming Article, “Bamboozled by a Comma: The Second Circuit’s Misdiagnosis of Ambiguity in American International Group, Inc. v. Bank of America Corp.” by Ken Adams, Adams On Contract Drafting Blog (to be published in 16 Scribes J. Legal Writing (forthcoming 2014).

http://tinyurl.com/kzvf8e2

It may sound picky but, as Ken Adams’ example illustrates in this post, proper punctuation matters. A misplaced comma can completely change the meaning of a sentence.

A refresher on how to use commas properly never hurts. Julia Layton explains “10 Completely Wrong Ways to Use Commas” on How Stuff Works. -CCE

http://people.howstuffworks.com/10-wrong-ways-to-use-commas.htm

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Writing Well When In A Crunch.

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Legal Writing

≈ Comments Off on Writing Well When In A Crunch.

Tags

Deadlines, Legal Writing, Professor Anna P. Hemingway, Professor Jennifer M. Lear, Raymond Ward, the (new) legal writer blog

Quality Writing On A Tight Deadline, by Raymond Ward, the (new) legal writer blog

http://tinyurl.com/pwlrjmq

Writing a project at the last minute? What us? Goodness gracious, never! But, it might not hurt to take a peek, just in case. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The High Cost of Legal Services – Are More Paralegals An Answer?

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Law Office Management

≈ Comments Off on The High Cost of Legal Services – Are More Paralegals An Answer?

Tags

Attorneys Nonlawyers, CNN Opinion, Gillian Hadfield, Lawyers, Legal Aid, Legal Assistants, LinkedIn, Mianne Besser, Paralegals

Lawyers, Make Room For Nonlawyers, by Gillian Hadfield, CNN Opinion (with hat tip to Mainne Besser on LinkedIn)

http://tinyurl.com/jwbdunc

The majority of lawyers in my part of the world aggressively use experienced paralegals and legal assistants to provide lower costs and quality work for their clients. It is simple math. It cuts costs for clients and increases profits for the lawyers. It is a win-win. Yet, there is no dispute that legal fees, which include criminal fines and filing fees, depositions, discovery, and e-discovery expenses, can drive up a client’s bill in a hurry.

Like medical costs for a serious illness, many people find these expenses outside their reach. -CCE

 

In our country, lawyers and judges regulate their own markets. The upshot is that getting legal help is enormously expensive and out of reach for the vast majority of Americans. Anyone faced with a contract dispute, family crisis, foreclosure or eviction must pay a lawyer with a JD degree to provide service one-on-one in the same way lawyers have done business for hundreds of years.

Increasingly, the only ‘persons’ with access to legal help are “artificial persons” — corporations, organizations and governments. No wonder that in a 2010 New York study, it was shown 95% of people in housing court are unrepresented. The same is true in consumer credit and child support cases; 44% of people in foreclosures are representing themselves—against a well-represented bank, no small number of whom engaged in robo-signing and sued people based on faulty information.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Check Out the Power Under the Hood of Outlook 2013.

23 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Microsoft Office, Outlook

≈ Comments Off on Check Out the Power Under the Hood of Outlook 2013.

Tags

2013 Office Suite, Addictive Tips Blog, Microsoft 2013, Microsoft Office, Outlook, Outlook 2013, Waqas Ahmed

What’s New In Microsoft Outlook 2013? [Review], by Waqas Ahmed, Addictive Tips Blog

http://tinyurl.com/lcq9xcs

[T]his is the first time in history that the Office suite is designed by keeping desktop and touchscreen devices in mind, particularly when Windows 8 is just months away from its GA launch. One of the most powerful and frequently used applications in Office is the Outlook. Outlook 2013, akin to other programs in the suite, has received much love from the developers, and now looks more polished and elegant. Basically, it’s the same old Outlook with an improved functionality, aesthetics and ergonomics. We decided to do a brief overview of the new Office Suite, and an in-depth review of the new features, changes and enhancements that are made to MS Outlook.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Legal Writers, This Blog Is For You.

22 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in ALWD, Brief Writing, Citations, Footnotes, Legal Writing, Legislative History, Quotations, The Bluebook

≈ Comments Off on Legal Writers, This Blog Is For You.

Citing Legally Blog, by Peter W. Martin, Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law Emeritus, Cornell

http://citeblog.access-to-law.com/

If you have any interest in the fine points of legal citation and legal writing, this is the blog for you. Citation master, Peter Martin, who holds  an endowed chair named for the late Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law Emeritus at Cornell, has created a forum to discuss and elaborate on citations as they are used by counsel and the court.

This is a “must bookmark” for anyone interested in legal writing, cite-checking, or how to cite properly. Please click on “About – Scope and Purpose” to read more about the authors’ intent for this blog. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Second Circuit Denies Officers’ Qualified Immunity.

22 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Evidence, Excessive Force, Fourth Amendment - Search & Seizure, Governmental Tort Claim Act, Litigation

≈ Comments Off on Second Circuit Denies Officers’ Qualified Immunity.

Tags

Adam Klasfeld, Confidential Informant, Courthouse News Service, Drug Paraphernalia, Drugs, Excessive Use of Force, Fourth Amendment, No Knock Warrant, Qualified Immunity, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Kahn, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Pooler, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Weapons

Botched Drug Bust Sends Investigator to Court, By Adam Klasfeld, Courthouse News Service

http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/01/22/64741.htm

 When law enforcement execute a search warrant on a residence, officers can use the “knock and announce” rule. Police knock on the door, announce their  intent to enter, and wait a “reasonable time” for the resident to open the door. Obviously, this approach has its drawbacks. Officers’ announcement of their presence before entering the residence can cause possible destruction of evidence and/or endanger the officers or others.

Law enforcement has another option – the “no knock” rule, which is just what it sounds like. Officers can obtain a search warrant to enter without knocking and announcing their presence or intentions before entering the residence. To obtain a no-knock warrant, the officers need to prove to the judge issuing the warrant that the officers are not disregarding reliable information indicating that this type of use of force is inappropriate. When procedures are properly followed, the involved officers have qualified immunity if the homeowner later sues for damages or excessive use of force under the Fourth Amendment.

When issuing a no-knock warrant, the police kick in or knock down the door to enter the residence. Regardless of the method, the door is often completely knocked off its hinges. In this Second Circuit case, the effect was even more dramatic. Around 6 a.m., Ms. McColley, a mother, and her young daughter woke to the sounds of the police knocking down the front door and the explosion of a flash bang grenade. -CCE

An immunity defense is premature for the drug investigator who led a turbulent raid on the apartment of a family with no criminal history, the 2nd Circuit ruled.

*     *     *

Michael Riley, an investigator for the Rensselaer County Drug & Gang Task Force, obtained the warrant days earlier based on the word of a confidential informant.

Though the CI claimed to have bought crack-cocaine from a man named Sport at the apartment, Riley conducted a background check on the property that revealed McColley as the tenant with her spotless record and young child.

He applied for the no-knock warrant anyway without mentioning the background check, the two-judge majority found.

‘The search of McColley’s home did not uncover any money, weapons, drugs, drug-related paraphernalia, or any evidence of criminality of any kind,’ Judge Rosemary Pooler wrote for the court. ‘The ERT took only a National Grid electric and gas bill and a registration bill for Hudson Valley Community College as fruits of the search.’

Accused of violating McColley’s Fourth Amendment rights, Rensaleer and Riley claimed qualified immunity, but U.S. District Judge Lawrence Kahn denied them summary judgment.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

When Do You File An Appeal?

22 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Appeals, Attorney Fees, Final Appealable Order, Louisiana Civil Appeals Blog, Raymond Ward

Finality Of Judgment When Attorney’s Fees Not Yet Determined, by Raymond Ward, Louisiana Civil Appeals

http://tinyurl.com/pjcrk32

Mr. Ward raises an interesting point. An appeal cannot be filed until the court issues a final, appealable order. In many jurisdictions, the trial court’s journal entry or judgment on the merits of the all the causes of action in a case is indeed a final, appealable order, even when the court has not yet ruled on an attorney fee and cost award.

Sometimes attorneys wait to file an appeal until the attorney fee award is decided, which may be past the tolling of the 30-day deadline to file the appeal on the merits. Mr. Ward explains how to resolve this issue. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Experienced Malware Attacks On Chrome Extensions? You’re Not The Only One.

20 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Chrome, Legal Technology

≈ Comments Off on Experienced Malware Attacks On Chrome Extensions? You’re Not The Only One.

Tags

Adware Vendors, BBC News Technology, Chrome, Chrome Extensions, Malware, Risk Assessment/Security & Hactivisim, Ron Amadeo, Spam

Adware Vendors Buy Chrome Extensions To Send Ad- And Malware-Filled Updates, by Ron Amadeo, Risk Assessment/Security & Hactivisim

http://tinyurl.com/qheon5v

AND

Chrome Extensions Targeted By Spam Firms, BBC News Technology

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25808193

There is good news – Chrome’s extension policy will change in June 2014. Hopefully that will fix the problem. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

How To Disable The Typing Animation Feature in Office 2013.

20 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Excel, Legal Technology, Microsoft Office, PowerPoint, Word

≈ Comments Off on How To Disable The Typing Animation Feature in Office 2013.

Tags

Abdullah Saqib, Addictive Tips Blog, Office 2013, Typing Animation Feature

Disable Typing Animation In All Office 2013 Applications [Tip], by Abdullah Saqib, Addictive Tips Blog

http://tinyurl.com/8thsnp7

Have you made the switch to Microsoft Office 2013? If you have, hopefully you are happy with all the changes that inevitably follow each new version. The Addictive Tips Blog is a useful tool, along with the always handy “F1,” if you find that things do not work in the way they did in older versions.

This post shows you how to disable the typing animation feature. It is not a permanent change to the software – you can get it back anytime you want it. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

March 2014 Deadline for Federal Contract Compliance Program’s Revised Rules.

20 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Affirmative Action, Disabilities, Employment Law, Federal Contract Compliance Program, Veterans

≈ Comments Off on March 2014 Deadline for Federal Contract Compliance Program’s Revised Rules.

Tags

Affirmative Action, Disabilities, federal contractors, Husch Blackwell LLP, Lexology, Mary Elizabeth “Molly” Kurt, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program, Veterans

2014 Model Documents For New OFCCP Regulations, by Mary Elizabeth “Molly” Kurt, Husch Blackwell LLP, Lexology

http://tinyurl.com/kanzksl

Ms. Kurt has attached forms in Word to her post. -CCE

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program’s revised rules for veterans and individuals with disabilities take effect March 24, 2014. In addition to goal-setting/benchmarking and increased attention to good faith efforts, the rules will require federal contractors to deploy a number of new or revised forms. The forms include applicant and new hire invitations to self-identify, mandatory elements of job posting communications with the state job service, and new elements of the EEO job advertisement tagline. Certain of these documents will be required beginning on March 24, 2014, and use of others can be delayed until the first date of your next affirmative action plan year.

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

IRS Service Is Going From Bad To Worse.

20 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Fraud, Government, Identity Theft, Internal Revenue Service

≈ Comments Off on IRS Service Is Going From Bad To Worse.

Tags

Allison Linn, CNBC, Fraud Alert, Identity Theft, Identity theft fraud alert, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson, Taxpayer

Why IRS Customer Service Is Bad (And May Get Worse), by Allison Linn, CNBC

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101339980

[G]iven its limited resources, the IRS said that in 2014 it will stop preparing tax returns for people who need help, such as those who are elderly or disabled. The agency also plans to answer only “basic” tax law questions, and only during the normal filing season through April 15. Instead, it will direct people to the website and other automated sources of information.  . . .

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

19 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Android Phones, Apple, Blackberry Phones, Cell Phones, Legal Technology

≈ Comments Off on

Tags

Android Phones, Blackberry, Google LG Nexus 5, iPhone J.D. Blog, iPhone5s, iPhones, Jeff Richardson, Nerino J. Petro Jr., Samsung Galaxy X4, Wisconsin Lawyer

101: Smart Phone Wars 2014: Apple vs. Android, by Nerino J. Petro Jr., Wisconsin Lawyer (with hat tip to Jeff Richardson, iPhone J.D. Blog)

http://tinyurl.com/n2tyxba

The IT techs I know swear by iPhones and iPads. Lawyer friends say Android is the way to go. Both have cool apps – more than I would probably ever need. My personal experience is limited to iPhones.

This article compares the top three phones: iPhone5s, Google LG Nexus 5, and Samsung Galaxy X4. Which one would you choose? -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

North Carolina’s “Woman’s Right to Know Act” Unconstitutional Under First Amendment.

19 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Abortion, First Amendment

≈ Comments Off on North Carolina’s “Woman’s Right to Know Act” Unconstitutional Under First Amendment.

Tags

Abortion, City University of New York, Constitutional Law Prof Blog, First Amendment, North Carolina Supreme Court, Ruthann Robson, Stuart v. Loomis, The Woman's Right to Know Act, U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles, Ultrasound

Federal District Judge Invalidates North Carolina Abortion Provision on First Amendment Grounds, by Ruthann Robson, City University of New York, Constitutional Law Prof Blog

http://tinyurl.com/jvu9scb

In her opinion in Stuart v. Loomis, United States District Judge Catherine Eagles held the ‘speech and display’ provisions of North Carolina’s ‘The Woman’s Right to Know Act’ unconstitutional under the First Amendment. . . .

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Will Using Electronic Health Records Affect Your Privacy?

19 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Electronic Records, Health Law, HIPAA, Privacy

≈ Comments Off on Will Using Electronic Health Records Affect Your Privacy?

Tags

Electronic Records, Health Records, HIPAA, Privacy, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office for Civil Rights

Privacy, Security, And Electronic Health Records, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office for Civil Rights

http://tinyurl.com/kd7plbb

For more information, go to http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/.

Your health care provider may be moving from paper records to electronic health records (EHRs) or may be using EHRs already. EHRs allow providers to use information more effectively to improve the quality and efficiency of your care, but EHRs will not change the privacy protections or security safeguards that apply to your health information.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

LinkedIn’s Lawsuit Alerts Users To Be Pickier Accepting Invitations.

18 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Digital Millenium Copyright Act

≈ Comments Off on LinkedIn’s Lawsuit Alerts Users To Be Pickier Accepting Invitations.

Tags

Bots, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Digital Millenium Copyright Act, GigaOM, Jeff John Roberts, LinkedIn, Profiles, Scraping

Linkedin Sues To Stop Bots That Are Stealing Its User Profiles, by Jeff John Roberts, Gigaom

http://tinyurl.com/kqrmr9h

LinkedIn has filed a lawsuit to stop competitors that are scraping its servers and gathering hundreds of thousands of LinkedIn’s users’ profiles. The competitors use bots that use the information stolen from LinkedIn to create false profiles that attempt to interact with LinkedIn’s users. LinkedIn’s Complaint is included in Mr. Roberts’ post. -CCE

[I]t’s not immediately clear if LinkedIn has a clear-cut legal case since it is not necessarily illegal to copy information from a website. In its complaint, the company is relying on its own terms of services that forbid scraping as well as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

In the meantime, LinkedIn users may wish to be wary about which invitations to connect they accept.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts
Follow The Researching Paralegal on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Sign In/Register

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Archives

  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Recent Comments

Eric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
How to Treat Bad Cli… on Why Do Bad Clients Deserve The…

Recent Comments

Eric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
How to Treat Bad Cli… on Why Do Bad Clients Deserve The…
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Join 455 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d bloggers like this: