• Home
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

The Researching Paralegal

~ Articles and Research for Legal Professionals

The Researching Paralegal

Category Archives: Research

Power Online Legal Research Tools

26 Friday Nov 2021

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Bloomberg Law, FastCase, LexisNexis, Research, Westlaw

≈ Comments Off on Power Online Legal Research Tools

Tags

Legal Research, Terms and Connectors

Basic Legal Research – Terms and Connectors Searching, by Northern Illinois University College of Law, David C. Shapiro Memorial Law Library

https://libguides.niu.edu/basic-legal-research

When you do online legal research, do you have the luxury of time to poke around or do you have to get in, find what you need, and get out as fast as you can? I often feel as if I have limited time to dig as deep as I want. Usually, basic connectors – within the same sentence or paragraph and with parentheses – quickly help me find whatever I want, but not always. I am always looking for tips and tools that get the best results as quickly as I can, which is what drew me to this link. I hope it helps you too.

If you have a tip or tool that helps make you a master researcher, please share. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

In Custodia Legis Free Webinar Honeypot

22 Sunday Nov 2020

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Case of First Impression, Federal Law, Legislative History, Library of Congress, Research, U.S. Government

≈ Comments Off on In Custodia Legis Free Webinar Honeypot

Tags

Federal Statutory Research, In Custodia Legis, Margaret Wood

December 2020 US Law Webinars: These Are a Few of My Favorite Things, by Margaret Wood, In Custodia Legis, Law Librarians of Congress

https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2020/11/december-2020-us-law-webinars-these-are-a-few-of-my-favorite-things/?loclr=eaiclb

A CLE honeypot for those who need CLE credits to maintain bar requirements or professional paralegal designations or who simply want to improve their legal research skills. In Custodia Legis, Law Librarians of Congress, is now giving free one-hour webinars. On December 10, 2020, sign up for a review of the U.S. Code and Statutes at Large. In February, there will be a webinar on case law.

If you are asking yourself why on earth would I need to know anything about the Statutes at Large, or do not know what it is, here is a refresher: https://bit.ly/35TKW0f. If you ever have had to research the legislative intent of a federal statute, this is one of the best research tools to find it.  

I highly recommend signing up to sharpen up your research skills regardless of whether you need the CLE credits. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Westlaw’s New Search Tool – The Carat ^

21 Sunday Jun 2020

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Research, Westlaw

≈ Comments Off on Westlaw’s New Search Tool – The Carat ^

Add Term Emphasis to Your Westlaw Search with The Carat Symbol, Cleveland Marshall College of Law Library Blog (with hat tip to William P. Statsky)

https://cmlawlibraryblog.classcaster.net/2020/06/18/add-term-emphasis-to-your-westlaw-search-with-the-caret-symbol/

Westlaw has added an important search term, the carat (^) (shift 6 on your keyboard).  This allows you to put more emphasis on a search term. To use it, place the carat symbol right behind the term you want emphasized.

If you need a refresher on Westlaw Edge, check this out:

Westlaw’s Guide to Law Review Research, which includes the carat symbol as well:

https://bit.ly/3fLKqDk

I have used Westlaw for a long time, but can always use any tips I can get! -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

16 PARALEGAL BLOGS FOR 2020

29 Wednesday Apr 2020

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Blogs, Legal Technology, Legal Writing, Paralegals/Legal Assistants, Research

≈ Comments Off on 16 PARALEGAL BLOGS FOR 2020

Tags

Online Master of Legal Studies, Online Master Paralegal Blogs for 2020

16 PARALEGAL BLOGS FOR 2020, BY Online Master Paralegal Blogs for 2020

https://onlinemasteroflegalstudies.com/resources/paralegal-blogs/

A list of valuable and helpful blogs for paralegal professionals and paralegal students. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Legal Research Finally Demystified.

26 Sunday Apr 2020

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Case Law, Court Rules, Federal Law, Internet, Law Journals, Law Reviews, Legal Encyclopedia, Legislative History, Mandatory Law, Primary Law, Regulations, Research, Secondary Resources, State Law, Statutes

≈ Comments Off on Legal Research Finally Demystified.

Tags

Eric Voight, Legal Analysis, Legal Research

Legal Research Demystified, by Eric Voight, Professor of Legal Research and Writing, Faulkner University

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3354594 (table of contents and a sample chapter)

I have a new favorite legal research textbook and reference guide for law and paralegal students — Legal Research Demystified.  In my opinion, it offers a fresh approach to finding and understanding the law. It guides a student in a logical process to research common law and statutory issues. It minimizes the chances that students will miss an important step or forget a necessary tool, such as the digest system or a citator.    

I like the way this book uses hypotheticals and visual aids, including screen captures from online databases, checklists, and charts. It does what a book on legal research should do – it shows and tells you how to do legal research rather than discussing finding research tools in a vacuum.

Everyone learns in a different way, but I think the opportunity to practice what you have learned is one of the strongest ways to teach. I was impressed to see that both students and professors have access to online exercises for each chapter using Core Knowledge for Lawyers (https://coreknowledgeforlawyers.com).

Each self-guided exercise walks students through the steps identified in the textbook and teaches them to research on Westlaw and Lexis Advance, again using visual aids, tips, and hypotheticals. As students electronically answer each question, Core Knowledge instantly provides feedback and an explanation of the right anwer.  It is my understanding that additional exercises should be available May 2020. -CCE

 

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Excellent Beginner’s Guide to Federal Legislative Intent.

14 Sunday Jul 2019

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Code of Federal Regulations, Federal Law, Legislative History, Research, Statutes

≈ Comments Off on Excellent Beginner’s Guide to Federal Legislative Intent.

Tags

In Custodia Legis Blog, Legal Research, Legislative Intent, Statutes at Large

Research Guides in Focus – Compiling a Federal Legislative History: A Beginner’s Guide, by Barbara Bavis, In Custodia Legis Blog

https://guides.loc.gov/legislative-history/introduction?loclr=bloglaw

You may remember the Schoolhouse Rock song, “I’m Just a Bill.” Both state and federal laws – statutes – start out as just a bill. Once the bill is passed by a state or federal legislature and signed by a governor or the President, it becomes law. If you want to be proficient in legal research, it is important to understand this process. This post is an excellent introduction to federal legislative intent and how to use it to research and interpret federal statutes, also called codes.

If you are researching a new statute, you need to know where to look. Once a statute becomes law, it is not immediately categorized into the federal code.  Instead, it is published chronologically in the Statutes at Large. (See https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/.)  Statutes are “codified,” meaning categorized and published in the United States Code, anywhere from 6 weeks to a year after it became law.  The United States Code, just like state statutes, are organized alphabetically into titles and numbered consecutively, such as Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. (See http://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml.)

There will be situations in which you will need to research why a statute or federal code was written and passed into law. When the legal argument hinges on a particular law, we normally look to case law to see how our jurisdiction’s court, or those that would be persuasive to our court, interpreted this statute. But, if your statute is recent and no case law has yet addressed it, you must research the legislative intent to support your argument. In other words, why was the bill written, what was its purpose, and what were the reasons given when the bill was debated to pass it?

Courts apply the law to the facts of each case to decide that case’s outcome, while relying on precedent and doctrine of stare decisis. But, when no case law interpreting a law exists in your jurisdiction – a case of “first impression” – you must look elsewhere for legal authority to support your argument.  Persuasive authority, cases decided by courts from other jurisdictions, can be just that – persuasive – but they are not cases your court must follow. The legislative intent is a stronger argument on which your court can rely to make its decision.

Because the Library of Congress and other online sources have digitalized the Statutes at Large and other online resources, it is much easier to research federal legislative intent. I encourage you to look to the Library of Congress and the law librarians at In Custodia Legis Blog to help you on that journey. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Justice Manual.

02 Tuesday Oct 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Research, U.S. Government

≈ Comments Off on The Justice Manual.

Tags

Justice Manual, U.S. Attorneys' Manual, U.S. Department of Justice, William Statsky

The Justice Manual (JM), formerly The United States Attorneys’ Manual (with hat tip to William Statsky)

https://www.justice.gov/jm/justice-manual

This is the current and official copy of the Justice Manual (JM). The JM was previously known as the United States Attorneys’ Manual (USAM). It was comprehensively revised and renamed in 2018. Sections may be updated periodically. In general, the date of last revision will be noted at the end of each section. For prior versions of the USAM, visit the USAM Archive.

Take your time with this one. There is a lot of information to digest. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Heads Up! Federal Civil Procedure Amendments Effective December 1, 2018.

30 Sunday Sep 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Federal Law, Research

≈ Comments Off on Heads Up! Federal Civil Procedure Amendments Effective December 1, 2018.

Tags

2018-2019 Amendments, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2018-2019 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Approved © 2014-2018 The National Court Rules Committee

https://bit.ly/2R9XNC5

The U.S. Supreme Court approved amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on April 26, 2018. The new amendments go into effect on December 1, 2018, which is now only a few months away. As usual, new text is underlined; deleted text is struck through.

When you review the amendments, I recommend taking the time to read the notes that explain the reasons for the changes. As for the amendment to Rule 5. I suggest that, if you serve a complaint by e-mail, use the email option to show delivery to and/or read receipt by the recipient.

This link will take you to the revised rules, but it is also a free resource that provides access to all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For both reasons, worth a bookmark. – CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The ABA’s Web 100.

15 Sunday Jul 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in References, Research, Social Media

≈ Comments Off on The ABA’s Web 100.

Tags

ABA Blawg Hall of Fame, ABA Journal, The Web 100

Web 100 Amici, ABA Journal, American Bar Association

Every year for the last decade, the ABA has solicited votes for nominations for the favorite law-related blog. Those chosen based on your nominations become the Web 100 for that year. Over the years, it’s expanded to include other law-related technology, and added its own Blawg Hall of Fame. It’s definitely worth a look to rediscover old favorites and others goodies you might have missed.

It’s that time of year again. Nominate your favorite law-related blog, podcast, social media feed, app, or interactive feature for recognition in this year of the ABA’s Web 100. You will find the nomination form at the link below. -CCE

http://www.abajournal.com/blawgs/web100/

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Lexis Advance Gets Touchy Feely. Let the Marketing Begin.

14 Saturday Jul 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in LexisNexis, Recent Links and Articles, Research, Westlaw

≈ Comments Off on Lexis Advance Gets Touchy Feely. Let the Marketing Begin.

Tags

Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog, Lexis Advance, Westlaw Edge

LexisNexis launches Lexis Analytics, by Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog

https://llb2.com/2018/07/13/lexisnexis-launches-lexis-analytics/

Yesterday, LexisNexis launched Lexis Analytics. From the press release:

“The suite consists of new and enhanced products fueled by smart content from Lexis Advance and the strategic acquisitions of Lex Machina, Intelligize and Ravel Law, and integrates the most powerful technologies in the legal space, including machine learning, artificial intelligence (A.I.) and visualization tools.”

Interestingly, Thomson Reuter launched Westlaw Edge, West Search Plus, Analytics, Enhanced Citator and More, on the same day as the Lexis Advance launch. Joe Hodnicki believes that Westlaw Edge is more powerful and stiff competition to Lexis Advance. Those of you who use these products, what do you think? -CCE

 

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Are You Happy with LexisNexis’ Ethics, Marketing, and Lexis Advance? AALL Isn’t.

09 Monday Jul 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Law Libraries, LexisNexis, Research

≈ Comments Off on Are You Happy with LexisNexis’ Ethics, Marketing, and Lexis Advance? AALL Isn’t.

Tags

American Association of Law Libraries, Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog, Lexis Advance, LexisNexis

Tying Controversy: AALL Statement on July 2 Meeting with Lexis Representatives, by Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog

https://llb2.com/2018/07/06/tying-controversy-aall-statement-on-july-2-meeting-with-lexis-representatives/

If you have not noticed, there is a growing controversy with LexisNexis’ ethics and marketing practices. This affects all law schools, paralegal educators, and law firms that subscribe to LexisNexis. For a bit of the back story, see LexisNexis’ Next-Generation Solution Means End of Lexis.com at http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2016/12/last-rites-lexis-com-lexisnexis-sets-date-shutdown.html. Here is more to the point from Joe Hodnicki, who has been closely following the dialogue between LexisNexis and the AALL: https://llb2.com/2018/06/15/early-coverage-of-aall-lexisnexis-anticompetitive-tying-controversy/.

Heads’ up, LexisNexis subscribers. – CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Common Flaw With Legal Database Providers.

29 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Bloomberg Law, Casemaker, FastCase, Google Scholar, LexisNexis, Research, Westlaw

≈ Comments Off on The Common Flaw With Legal Database Providers.

Tags

Algorithms, Headnotes, Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog, Legal Research, Lexis, Westlaw

The Algorithm as a Human Artifact: Implications for Legal {Re}Search, by Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog

https://bit.ly/2GVxQzz

Susan Nevelow Mart is a law professor at the University of Colorado’s Law School. Her article has earned significant attention and recognition, and for good reason.

Most lawyers and paralegals learn legal research using Westlaw and Lexis, with an emphasis on using headnotes to research relevant law. Because humans write the headnotes and the search algorithms, there is a considerable variation in the results in our legal research.

[W]hen comparing the top ten results for the same search entered into the same jurisdictional case database in Casetext, Fastcase, Google Scholar, Lexis Advance, Ravel, and Westlaw, the results are a remarkable testament to the variability of human problem solving. There is hardly any overlap in the cases that appear in the top ten results returned by each database.

Hardly any overlap? Imagine how this affects cases argued by the parties and decided by the courts. But, there’s more. The percentage of relevant sources differs for all providers.

One of the most surprising results was the clustering among the databases in terms of the percentage of relevant results. The oldest database providers, Westlaw and Lexis, had the highest percentages of relevant results, at 67% and 57%, respectively. The newer legal database providers, Fastcase, Google Scholar, Casetext, and Ravel, were also clustered together at a lower relevance rate, returning approximately 40% relevant results.

Professor Mart reminds us that thorough legal research has always involved redundancy. We already know that different search terms give us new results to investigate. She recommends using multiple resources with multiple searches, and calls for more accountability by legal database providers.

We cannot change what the legal database providers have already done. We do have control over the thoroughness of our research and our search strategies. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

State-by-State Recording Laws from the Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press.

04 Wednesday Apr 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Admissibility, Authentication, Discovery, Evidence, Recordings, Research, State Law, Statutes

≈ Comments Off on State-by-State Recording Laws from the Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Tags

Recordings, Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press, State Statutes

State-by-State Reporter’s Guide – Tape Recording Laws At a Glance, Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press

https://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/state-state-guide

Do you ever record a telephone conversation without telling the person at the other end of the line? It happens quite frequently. But, is it legal? Do you need the other person’s consent? Can it be used as evidence in court? Could you get arrested if you let someone else listen to it? What about hidden cameras?

These statutes were last updated in 2012. When you find your state and the relevant statute, verify that the law has not been changed since 2012. I would take it one more step, and check to see whether there is any pending legislation that might change the law. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Historical Supreme Court Cases Now Free Online.

27 Tuesday Mar 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Case Law, Federal Law, Library of Congress, Research, United States Supreme Court

≈ Comments Off on Historical Supreme Court Cases Now Free Online.

Tags

Hein & Co., Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog, U.S. Supreme Court

Historical Supreme Court cases now online thanks to Library of Congress (and Hein & Co.), by Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog

https://bit.ly/2GeSxLG

According to the press release, ‘More than 225 years of Supreme Court decisions acquired by the Library of Congress are now publicly available online – free to access in a page image format for the first time. The Library has made available more than 35,000 cases that were published in the printed bound editions of United States Reports. … The digital versions of the U.S. Reports in the new collection were acquired by the Law Library of Congress through a purchase agreement with William S. Hein & Co. Inc. The acquisition is part of the Law Library’s transition to a digital future and in support of its efforts to make historical U.S. public domain legal materials freely and easily available to Congress and the world.’ You can access the collection here.”

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Federal Research Honey Pot.

14 Wednesday Mar 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Federal Law, Legal Analysis, Legal Writing, Research, SSRN, Statutory Interpretation

≈ Comments Off on Federal Research Honey Pot.

Tags

Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl, Federal Courts, Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog, Legal Research, Statutory Interpretation

Comparing Methods of Statutory Interpretation Used By The Lower Federal Courts and The Supreme Court, by Joe Hodnicki, Law Librarian Blog

http://bit.ly/2pd4k2t

Joe Hodnicki calls this article “recommended,” which means we just found a honey pot for those who research federal case law and statutory interpretation. -CCE

“Here’s the abstract for Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl’s very interesting Statutory Interpretation and the Rest of the Iceberg: Divergences between the Lower Federal Courts and the Supreme Court, Duke Law Journal, Forthcoming:

‘This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, especially the federal district courts, and compares those methods to the practices of the U.S. Supreme Court. This novel research reveals both similarities across courts and some striking differences. The research shows that some interpretive tools are highly overrepresented in the Supreme Court’s decisions while other tools are much more prevalent in the lower courts. Another finding, based on a study of forty years of cases, is that all federal courts have shifted toward more textualist tools in recent decades but that the shift was less pronounced as one moves down the judicial hierarchy.

The divergence between the interpretive practices of different federal courts has implications for both descriptive and normative accounts of statutory interpretation.’ . . .” Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Update to Historical Statutes At Large Online.

19 Monday Feb 2018

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Federal Law, Library of Congress, Research

≈ Comments Off on Update to Historical Statutes At Large Online.

Tags

In Custodia Legis, Jennifer Gonzalez, Law Librarians of Congress, Statutes at Large

More Historical Statutes at Large Available Online, by Jennifer González, In Custodia Legis, Law Librarians of Congress

http://bit.ly/2Fdv49P

The individual statutes for congresses 68 through 81 are now available on the Law Library of Congress website. This addition closes the gap for the years for which the Statutes at Large were not available on the Internet. As with the volumes for previous congresses, each of these statutes is tagged with tailored, descriptive metadata to help users search and browse by facets.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Historical Versions to the U.S. Code Now Free Online.

27 Wednesday Dec 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Federal Law, Research, Statutes

≈ Comments Off on Historical Versions to the U.S. Code Now Free Online.

Tags

beSpacific Blog., Library of Congress, Office of the Law Revision Counsel, Sabrina I. Pacifici, U.S. Code

Historical Versions of the United States Code Now Online, by Sabrina I. Pacifici, beSpacific Blog

https://www.bespacific.com/historical-versions-of-the-united-states-code-now-online/

The Library of Congress has bought over 60 years of the U.S. Code from Hein Online. The historical research you will find here has not been available for free online before this publication by the Library of Congress. Because of the depth of the research at this site, you should definitely take a look.

This link will take you directly to the website, which will also give you a complete description of the information you will find there: https://www.loc.gov/collections/united-states-code. I also suggest taking the time to check out this link for the United States Code prepared by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives: http://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml.

There will be times when you will find no case law to support a state or federal statute. To make a convincing argument to the court, you may need to rely upon the legislative intent – the reason why the legislature made the law. To do that, you will need to read committee reports and other information to fully understand the legislature’s rationalization for writing the law as it did. These websites should enhance your ability to perform that research for federal statutes. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

South Carolina Legal Blogs – The Cream of the Crop.

13 Wednesday Dec 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Elder Law, Family Law, Litigation, Personal Injury, Probate and Trusts, Research, South Carolina Supreme Court, State Law, Tax Law

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Justia, Legal Research, South Carolina Legal Blawgs

Most Popular South Carolina Blawgs, Blawg Search, Justia

https://blawgsearch.justia.com/blogs/countries/united-states/south-carolina

For my paralegal friends in South Carolina, here’s the top legal blogs in South Carolina sorted by popularity. There’s a little bit of everything here, and several caught my eye. It will take a while to digest it all. I recommend bookmarking this site, and visiting it often. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Largest Free Online Law Library On The Internet.

26 Sunday Nov 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Library of Congress, Research

≈ Comments Off on The Largest Free Online Law Library On The Internet.

Tags

In Custodia Legis, Law library, Library of Congress, Robert Brammer

Guide to Law Online, Library of Congress

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/guide.php

The title speaks for itself. The Law Library for the Library of Congress is the world’s biggest free law library. It has international law, federal law, and law for every state in the country.

If you are new to legal research and not quite sure how to start, click on Robert Brammer’s An Index to In Custodia Legis Legal Research Guides. (http://blogs.loc.gov/law/category/research-guide-2/) This is a honey pot of beginner guides for locating free case law on the Internet, constitutional law, consumer protection law, contracts, social security disability, employment/labor law, legal ethics, discovery, evidence, patent law, real estate, small claims, legal writing, and much, much more.

Because there is so much information here, I suggest that you go to the main site and just start browsing. Get acquainted with its structure and note what interests you most. This Guide to Law Online worth a bookmark, regardless of your legal research expertise. -CCE

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

2016 Federal Sentencing Guidelines

23 Thursday Nov 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Federal Law, Federal Sentencing, Research

≈ Comments Off on 2016 Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Tags

Sentencing Guidelines, United States Sentencing Commission

2016 Sentencing Guidelines, United States Sentencing Commission

https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines

This Sentencing Guideline became effective November 1, 2016. Because there have been no new amendments to the Guidelines, these guidelines are still effective as of November 1, 2017.

This website provides more than just the federal sentencing guidelines. There are also sections on Research, Policymaking, Education, and “By Topic.” If you wish, you can subscribe to receive updates from the website by email. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

“Google It!” Cut Your Research Time and Improve Your Results With These Google Search Secrets.

29 Sunday Oct 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Google, References, Research

≈ Comments Off on “Google It!” Cut Your Research Time and Improve Your Results With These Google Search Secrets.

Tags

FreewareFiles.com©2017, Google, Research Tips

How to Master Google Search Secrets, by FreewareFiles.com©2017

http://bit.ly/2iK8RJ2

Google and its brand are synonymous with a search for information using the Internet. But are we using it to its full potential? Probably not.

There is much more you can do with Google rather than simply typing general or specific terms and clicking “search.” This post provides tools, hacks, search secrets, and advanced search secrets too easy to ignore. Use them to speed up your search results, and make yourself a Google master. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Updated Annual Guide to Law Review Submissions.

31 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Law Reviews, Legal Writing, Research

≈ Comments Off on Updated Annual Guide to Law Review Submissions.

Tags

James B. Levy, Law Journals, Law Reviews, Legal Skills Blog, Legal Writing, Professor Allen Rostron, Professor Nancy Levit, SSRN

The Latest Update to Rostron’s and Levit’s Annual Guide to Law Review Submissions, by James B. Levy, Legal Skills Blog

http://bit.ly/2uP9FyB

Thinking about submitting an article to a law review or journal? If so, you need to read this. It will give you everything you need to know about which publication is accepting submissions, required procedures and formats, and more. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Updated Research Guide from Sabrina Pacifici.

18 Sunday Jun 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Research

≈ Comments Off on Updated Research Guide from Sabrina Pacifici.

Tags

Legal Research, LLRX.com, Sabrina I. Pacifici, Search Engines

Competitive Intelligence – A Selective Resource Guide – Updated June 2017, by Sabrina I. Pacifici, LLRX.com

https://www.llrx.com/archives/subject/competitive-intelligence-resource-guide/

Sabrina Pacifici is, and has been, a prolific and reliable legal research resource for as long as I can remember. The quality of her work is without question. Here, she has given us a gift of a large compilation of excellent research sources, updated this month, and a “must bookmark.” I highly recommend her. -CCE

 

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

2017 United States Sentencing Commission Website.

01 Saturday Apr 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Federal Law, Federal Sentencing, Research, Sentencing Guidelines

≈ Comments Off on 2017 United States Sentencing Commission Website.

Tags

2016 Guidelines Manual, Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Table, United States Sentencing Commission

United States Sentencing Commission

http://www.ussc.gov/

This federal government website has a honey pot of information. It has six categories. Here are some highlights you will find under each category:

1. About (includes Mission Statement and online seminar titled ‘An Insider Look at the United States Sentencing Commission’);

2. Guidelines (the 2016 Guidelines Manual, Sentencing Table, and Organizational Guidelines, including the most recent primers on various areas of criminal law);

3. Policymaking (Rules of Practice and Procedure);

4. Education (Guideline Training Materials);

5. By Topic; and

6. Research (Public Access to Commission Data and Documents List Of all Publications, 2016 Sourcebook, Quick Facts, and Data Reports).

The information you will find here is current and up to date. You can be sure that you are researching the most recent and updated guidelines, primers, sentencing table, policy, and laws. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Legal Aid Federal Practice Manual.

15 Wednesday Feb 2017

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Federal Law, Research

≈ Comments Off on Legal Aid Federal Practice Manual.

Tags

Federal Litigation, Legal Aid, Sergeant Shriver National Center on Poverty Law

Federal Practice Manual for Legal Aid Attorneys, Sergeant Shriver National Center on Poverty Law © 2016

http://federalpracticemanual.org/

Well written by qualified contributors. Please note that each section is updated, but not more recently than 2015. Anytime you use a secondary research source with dated information, research the data and law to determine whether it is current. Always check the law in your case’s jurisdiction as part of your ethical duty of due diligence, as well as all relevant court rules. -CCE

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts
Follow The Researching Paralegal on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Sign In/Register

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Archives

  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Recent Comments

Eric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
How to Treat Bad Cli… on Why Do Bad Clients Deserve The…

Recent Comments

Eric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
How to Treat Bad Cli… on Why Do Bad Clients Deserve The…
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Join 455 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d bloggers like this: