• Home
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

The Researching Paralegal

~ Articles and Research for Legal Professionals

The Researching Paralegal

Category Archives: Criminal Law

How Target Missed Malware Alarms and Blew It.

14 Friday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Consumer Law, Credit Repair, Criminal Law, Finance and Banking Law, Identity Theft

≈ Comments Off on How Target Missed Malware Alarms and Blew It.

Tags

Bangalore, Bloomberg Businessweek, FireEye, Gregg Steinhafel, Hackers, Internet Security, Jim Walter. McAfee, Malware, Nieman Marcus, Target, Technology, U.S. Department of Justice, Verizon Enterprise Solutions

Missed Alarms and 40 Million Stolen Credit Card Numbers: How Target Blew It, by Michael Riley, Ben Elgin, Dune Lawrence, and Carol Matlack, Bloomberg  Businessweek Technology

http://tinyurl.com/njsy4rm

The biggest retail hack in U.S. history wasn’t particularly inventive, nor did it appear destined for success. In the days prior to Thanksgiving 2013, someone installed malware in Target’s (TGT) security and payments system designed to steal every credit card used at the company’s 1,797 U.S. stores. At the critical moment—when the Christmas gifts had been scanned and bagged and the cashier asked for a swipe—the malware would step in, capture the shopper’s credit card number, and store it on a Target server commandeered by the hackers.

It’s a measure of how common these crimes have become, and how conventional the hackers’ approach in this case, that Target was prepared for such an attack. . . .

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Fifth Circuit Ignores Forensics Scandal.

03 Monday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Forensic Evidence, Mississippi Innocence Project

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Bite Marks, Kennedy Brewer, Levon Brooks, Louisiana, Medical Examiner, Michael West, Mississippi Innocence Project, National Association of Medical Examiners, Steven Hayne, Tavares Flaggs

The Fifth Circuit Turns Its Back on Forensics Scandal in Mississippi, by Radley Balko, The Washington Post, reposted in Forensic Magazine

http://tinyurl.com/m7b5hak

With a curt, three-page ruling late last month, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the post-conviction petition of Tavares Flaggs, a Mississippi man currently serving a life sentence for murder.

Flaggs was convicted in large part because of the testimony of Steven Hayne, a medical examiner who for about two decades was able to monopolize the autopsy business in Mississippi. This story should really be one of the bigger criminal justice scandals in recent U.S. history. It potentially affects thousands of cases, both criminal and civil. It involves wrongful convictions, and people let off who should be behind bars. Several of the people convicted based on flawed testimony from Hayne are still on death row, in both Mississippi and in Louisiana. Flaggs’ petition, filed by the Mississippi Innocence Project, was the most comprehensive summary of what happened in Mississippi yet to get before a federal court. The Fifth Circuit panel brushed it aside in just four paragraphs. . . .

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Attorney Who Introduces Drug Evidence May Face Criminal Charges.

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Drug Possession

≈ Comments Off on Attorney Who Introduces Drug Evidence May Face Criminal Charges.

Tags

Criminal Law, Drug Evidence, Drug Paraphernalia, Drug Possession, Judge Donald E. Machen, Law Enforcement, Lt. Leo O'Neill, Paula Reed Ward, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Wendy L. Williams

Attorney May Face Charges After Introducing Drug Evidence, by Paula Reed Ward, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

http://tinyurl.com/pdcyn6c

A Pittsburgh defense attorney could be facing criminal charges after she introduced potential drug evidence — a box containing a straw with suspected heroin residue — at a court hearing on Thursday.

Wendy L. Williams was instructed by Common Pleas Judge Donald E. Machen to get an attorney as Allegheny County sheriff’s deputies are now investigating the incident.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Can A Prisoner Get An Expert Witness Under Federal Rule 706 For His Medical Condition?

02 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 706, Summary judgment

≈ Comments Off on Can A Prisoner Get An Expert Witness Under Federal Rule 706 For His Medical Condition?

Tags

11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Alabama, Colin Miller, EvidenceProf Blog, Expert Witness, Federal Rules of Evidence, Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services, Hepatitis C, Prisoner, Rule 706, Summary judgment

Is There a Doctor in the House?: 11th Circuit Remands After Lower Court’s Erroneous Rule 706 Ruling, posted by Colin Miller, EvidenceProf Blog

http://tinyurl.com/n57dzzo

This post discusses an Alabama District Court’s and 11th Circuit Court of Appeal’s interpretation of Rule 706(a) of the Federal Rule of Evidence in a prisoner’s lawsuit in which he claims that he has Hepatitis C, his illness is not being treated and, without treatment, he will become sicker and die. -CCE

Federal Rule of Evidence 706(a) provides that:

On a party’s motion or on its own, the court may order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed and may ask the parties to submit nominations. The court may appoint any expert that the parties agree on and any of its own choosing. But the court may only appoint someone who consents to act.

As you can see from the language of Rule 706(a), there is nothing in the Rule’s text limiting expert appointment to either criminal or civil cases. So where did that leave the plaintiff in Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services, 2014 WL 701575 (11th Cir. 2014)?

 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Beautiful Young, Dead Paralegal Found in Bathtub of Attorney Boss Who Has Possible Mob Connections.

17 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Employment Law, Ethics, Grand Jury, Law Office Management, Legal Ethics, Management, Paralegals/Legal Assistants, Social Media, Supervising Support Staff, Using Social Media

≈ Comments Off on Beautiful Young, Dead Paralegal Found in Bathtub of Attorney Boss Who Has Possible Mob Connections.

Tags

A. Charles Peruto Jr., Above the Law (blog), Accidental Death, Alcohol, David Lat, District Attorney Seth Williams, Grand Jury, Julia Papazian Law, Paralegal, Philadelphia, Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office

Paralegal’s Death In Boss/Boyfriend’s Bathtub Declared Accidental, by David Lat, Above the Law Blog

http://tinyurl.com/k6fafzo

 Last May, a 26-year-old paralegal by the name of Julia Papazian Law was found dead in the bathtub of her boss and boyfriend, prominent Philadelphia defense attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. The news set tongues wagging in Philly. It had all the elements of a tabloid tale: a beautiful young woman, a wealthy and successful lawyer, and possible organized-crime connections. (Peruto has represented such prominent alleged Mob figures as Joey Merlino and Nicodemo Scarfo.) . . .

A grand jury was convened, conducted an investigation, and concluded there was no evidence that the paralegal’s death was anything but accidental. I saw no discussion or evidence of an investigation of any ethical or employment violations concerning the employer/employee relationship.

After the grand jury’s investigation, the paralegal’s boss used Facebook to reply to the District Attorney in a direct and explicit statement. -CCE  

http://tinyurl.com/lnbb9gh

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Keeping It Short and Sweet.

15 Saturday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Legal Writing, Texas Supreme Court

≈ Comments Off on Keeping It Short and Sweet.

Tags

Carving Doctrine, Ex parte McWilliams, Good Legal Writing, Presiding Judge Onion, Texas Supreme Court, Tiffany Johnson

Less is More, by Tiffany Johnson, Good Legal Writing

http://goodlegalwriting.com/2014/01/03/less-is-more/

I happened upon this interesting dissent in my research recently.  If you can forgive the biting tone (note the judge’s befitting name), I think the minimalist technique is pretty effective.  It’s not bogged down with preachy legalese.  It doesn’t pontificate or soliloquize. It’s short and (not so) sweet. . . .

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

A New Theory of Hearsay – Part 2.

11 Tuesday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, Admissibility, Criminal Law, Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, Hearsay, Trial Tips and Techniques, Witnesses

≈ Comments Off on A New Theory of Hearsay – Part 2.

Tags

Colin Miller, Criminal Defendants, Evidence, Evidence ProfBlogger, EvidenceProf Blog, Federal Rule of Evidence, Hearsay, Hearsay Exception, Impeach, Nonhearsay Purpose, Rule 609

A New Theory of Hearsay, Take 2: Rule 609(a)(1)(B) & Statements Offered For a Nonhearsay Purpose, by Evidence ProfBlogger (Colin Miller, Editor), EvidenceProf Blog

http://tinyurl.com/m8pcyw8

Dan is on trial for aggravated battery. He has a prior conviction for aggravated battery. After Dan testifies, the prosecution seeks to impeach him through evidence of his five year-old conviction for armed robbery. To be admissible, the evidence cannot simply satisfy Federal Rule of Evidence 403; instead, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1)(B), the prosecution must affirmatively prove that the probative value of the conviction outweighs its prejudicial effect.

A defendant calls an alibi witness at trial. After the alibi witness testifies on direct examination, the prosecution seeks to impeach him with evidence of a prior inconsistent statement that tends to incriminate the defendant. The prior statement is hearsay and only admissible to impeach that alibi witness, not to prove the truth of the matter asserted. My question today is: Should courts apply the same modified Rule 403 analysis that they would apply in the case above?

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

How Do Jurors In A Recession Really Feel About The Financial Industry?

09 Sunday Feb 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Class Actions, Corporate Law, Finance and Banking Law, Jury Persuasion, Jury Selection, Litigation, Trial Tips and Techniques, Voir Dire, White Collar Crime

≈ Comments Off on How Do Jurors In A Recession Really Feel About The Financial Industry?

Tags

Banking Industry, Elizabeth Babbitt M.A., Financial Institutions, For The Defense Magazine, High-Interest Loans, Housing Crash, Jill Leibold Ph.D., Juror Bias, Jurors, Litigation Insights, Louis A. Huber III, Mortgage Foreclosure, Recession

Take This To The Bank: Jurors’ Evaluations Of Financial Industry Defendants During A Recession, by Jill Leibold Ph.D., Director, Jury Research, Elizabeth Babbitt, M.A., Consultant, and Louis A. Huber III, of Schlee, Huber, McMullen and Krause, LITIGATION INSIGHTS

http://tinyurl.com/nx84u56

[I]n the following article, published in DRI’s, For the Defense magazine, we wanted to evaluate biases in the way jurors would view banking or finance defendants. Given that almost all of Americans have felt they’ve been affected by the most recent recession, we conducted a study to gauge those positive or negative attitudes toward the financial industry as well as piece together how these issues could shape jurors’ perceptions toward banking and finance defendants come trial. . . .

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Recent Rule Amendments by Arizona Supreme Court.

27 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Advertising, Arizona Supreme Court, Continuing Legal Education, Criminal Law, Legal Ethics

≈ Comments Off on Recent Rule Amendments by Arizona Supreme Court.

Tags

Advertising, Arizona Attorney Magazine, Limited Scope Representation, MCLE, Patricia Sallen, Post-Conviction Disclosure, State Bar of Arizona, Supreme Court of Arizona

Other Arizona Rule Amendments, by Patricia Sallen, Arizona Attorney Magazine|State Bar of Arizona

http://tinyurl.com/o9vq6rh

In addition to adding the new mechanism to ER 1.15, the Supreme Court also recently made other significant ethics and practice-related rule amendments.

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Second Circuit Denies Officers’ Qualified Immunity.

22 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Criminal Law, Evidence, Excessive Force, Fourth Amendment - Search & Seizure, Governmental Tort Claim Act, Litigation

≈ Comments Off on Second Circuit Denies Officers’ Qualified Immunity.

Tags

Adam Klasfeld, Confidential Informant, Courthouse News Service, Drug Paraphernalia, Drugs, Excessive Use of Force, Fourth Amendment, No Knock Warrant, Qualified Immunity, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Kahn, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Pooler, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Weapons

Botched Drug Bust Sends Investigator to Court, By Adam Klasfeld, Courthouse News Service

http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/01/22/64741.htm

 When law enforcement execute a search warrant on a residence, officers can use the “knock and announce” rule. Police knock on the door, announce their  intent to enter, and wait a “reasonable time” for the resident to open the door. Obviously, this approach has its drawbacks. Officers’ announcement of their presence before entering the residence can cause possible destruction of evidence and/or endanger the officers or others.

Law enforcement has another option – the “no knock” rule, which is just what it sounds like. Officers can obtain a search warrant to enter without knocking and announcing their presence or intentions before entering the residence. To obtain a no-knock warrant, the officers need to prove to the judge issuing the warrant that the officers are not disregarding reliable information indicating that this type of use of force is inappropriate. When procedures are properly followed, the involved officers have qualified immunity if the homeowner later sues for damages or excessive use of force under the Fourth Amendment.

When issuing a no-knock warrant, the police kick in or knock down the door to enter the residence. Regardless of the method, the door is often completely knocked off its hinges. In this Second Circuit case, the effect was even more dramatic. Around 6 a.m., Ms. McColley, a mother, and her young daughter woke to the sounds of the police knocking down the front door and the explosion of a flash bang grenade. -CCE

An immunity defense is premature for the drug investigator who led a turbulent raid on the apartment of a family with no criminal history, the 2nd Circuit ruled.

*     *     *

Michael Riley, an investigator for the Rensselaer County Drug & Gang Task Force, obtained the warrant days earlier based on the word of a confidential informant.

Though the CI claimed to have bought crack-cocaine from a man named Sport at the apartment, Riley conducted a background check on the property that revealed McColley as the tenant with her spotless record and young child.

He applied for the no-knock warrant anyway without mentioning the background check, the two-judge majority found.

‘The search of McColley’s home did not uncover any money, weapons, drugs, drug-related paraphernalia, or any evidence of criminality of any kind,’ Judge Rosemary Pooler wrote for the court. ‘The ERT took only a National Grid electric and gas bill and a registration bill for Hudson Valley Community College as fruits of the search.’

Accused of violating McColley’s Fourth Amendment rights, Rensaleer and Riley claimed qualified immunity, but U.S. District Judge Lawrence Kahn denied them summary judgment.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

U.S. Probation Office Now Has LENS (Law Enforcement Notification System).

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Law Enforcement

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Crime, DUI, FBI, Law Enforcement, LENS, The Third Branch News, United States Courts, US Probation Office

With LENS, Offender Data Quickly Reaches Officers on Beat, posted by The Third Branch News, United States Courts

http://news.uscourts.gov/lens-offender-data-quickly-reaches-officers-beat

A police officer on a DUI stop, logs into the online Law Enforcement Notification System (LENS) and finds that not only is the driver under federal supervision for a prior drug offense, but the conditions of release stipulate no alcohol use.

By statute, following release of a prisoner convicted of a drug trafficking crime, crime of violence, or sex offense, the U.S. Probation Office must notify the chief law enforcement officer of the state and of the local jurisdiction when an offender moves into their jurisdiction. All 94 probation offices nationwide are now using LENS to make these notifications easier and more efficiently. And because LENS notifies local law enforcement at the beginning of supervision, it also promotes greater public safety.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

South Carolina’s Shocking History of Neglect and Abuse In Its Prison System.

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Department of Corrections, Justice Reform

≈ Comments Off on South Carolina’s Shocking History of Neglect and Abuse In Its Prison System.

Tags

Andrew Cohen, Department of Corrections, Department of Mental Health, Director Jon Ozmint, Governor Mark Sanford, Judge Michael Baxley, Michael Moore, Prison Reform, Senate Corrections and Penology Committee, Senator Mike Fair, South Carolina, Terri LeClercq, The Atlantic

When Good People Do Nothing: The Appalling Story of South Carolina’s Prisons, by Andrew Cohen, The Atlantic (with hat tip to Terri LeClercq!)

http://tinyurl.com/nucntkb

‘[W]hen good people do nothing’ is a timeless moral question, indeed.

One could say the same thing about the citizens of the state of South Carolina, who stand condemned today by one of their own. On Wednesday, in one of the most wrenching opinions you will ever read, a state judge in Columbia ruled that South Carolina prison officials were culpable of pervasive, systemic, unremitting violations of the state’s constitution by abusing and neglecting mentally ill inmates. The judge, Michael Baxley, a decorated former legislator, called it the “most troubling” case he ever had seen and I cannot disagree. Read the ruling. It’s heartbreaking.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Oklahoma Governor and Politicians Squash Latest Attempt For Justice Reform.

08 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Government, Justice Reform, Open Records Act

≈ Comments Off on Oklahoma Governor and Politicians Squash Latest Attempt For Justice Reform.

Tags

Big Brothers Big Sisters, Clifton Adcock, Incarceration, Justice Reform, Justice Reinvestment Initiative, Mary Fallin, Oklahoma, Oklahoma Ethics Commission, Oklahoma Watch, Open Records Act, Prison, Private Prison Companies

Special Report: How Actions by Governor’s Staff Led to Weakened State Justice Reforms, by Clifton Adcock, Oklahoma Watch

http://tinyurl.com/mp9xr7q

Oklahoma’s incarceration rate is one of the highest in the nation. Oklahoma incarcerates the most women in the United States and is the third highest state in incarceration of men. According to Oklahoma’s Big Brothers Big Sisters, which recently lost its federal funding to its Mentoring Children of Prisoner’s Program, 27,000 children in Oklahoma have one or both parents in prison today. The concern over Oklahoma’s increasing prison population and ripple effect on its citizens makes this latest lost opportunity even more discouraging. -CCE

Note: Oklahoma Watch is offering this detailed, 4,500-word story on events that led up to changes in the state’s most significant justice-reform effort in recent history. With Oklahoma having some of the nation’s highest incarceration rates, hopes soared in 2012 among leaders and residents when the Justice Reinvestment Initiative was signed into law. Others viewed it skeptically. Newly released records reveal what happened in state government that led to a weakening of the original plan for implementing the reforms.


Behind-the-scenes moves by Gov. Mary Fallin’s senior staff members helped lead to a severe weakening of a program designed to cut the state’s high incarceration rates and save taxpayers more than $200 million over a decade, according to interviews and records obtained by Oklahoma Watch.

The efforts by the governor’s staff, assisted by legislative leaders, to take control of the Justice Reinvestment Initiative took place during periods when staff members met with representatives of private prison companies, which stood to gain or lose depending on how the initiative was implemented, emails and logs of visitors to Fallin’s offices show.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Internet Use Admissible Evidence in Negligent Homicide Charge.

28 Saturday Dec 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law

≈ Comments Off on Internet Use Admissible Evidence in Negligent Homicide Charge.

Tags

Breast implant, Internet, Legal Profession Blog, Legal Profession Prof, Negligent homicide, New Hampshire Supreme Court

Internet Use Admissible In Death Of Child, by Legal Profession Prof, Legal Profession Blog

http://tinyurl.com/m879je5

A mother convicted of negligent homicide and related offenses after one of her children drowned in a bathtub and another was severely injured appealed, claiming the trial court erred in admitting evidence of her internet use while the children were in the tub.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Affluenza? Don’t Laugh. It Apparently Worked.

14 Saturday Dec 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Drunk Driving

≈ Comments Off on Affluenza? Don’t Laugh. It Apparently Worked.

Tags

Affluenza, Criminal Law, Drunk Driving, Ethan Couch, Judge Jean Boyd, Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar Blog

Okay, I Thought People Were Using “Affluenza” as a Joke, by Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar Blog

http://tinyurl.com/lbc2hmv

You may have heard recently about Ethan Couch, a 16-year old teenager from a wealthy family who stole beer, got drunk, and had a drunk driving accident. He was driving close to 70 miles-per-hour. He hit and killed four people who standing on the side of the road, and injured nine others.

His parents wanted the Court to send their son to a treatment facility in Newport Beach that had “equine therapy.” They reasoned that the accident was their fault. After all, they had allowed their son to start driving when he was 13. They also given him everything he had ever wanted. Obviously, with this incident, they learned their lesson. (That is sarcasm for those who might not recognize it.)

The defense’s psychologist expert witness who testified at trial in support of this young man recommended that the youth should be treated rather than jailed. The expert opined that this 16-year old suffered from “affluenza.” No, this is not a genuine psychological affliction.

The prosecution’s response was that the juvenile justice system also provides therapy. At least everyone agrees that this young man needs counseling and therapy.

It comes as no surprise that this young man has been in trouble before with the police without consequences from the law or his parents. For this drunk driving incident, this young man could have received a twenty year jail sentence. The Judge, the Hon. Jean Boyd, sentenced him to ten years of probation. -CCE

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Legal Rules Needed For Police To Allow Access To Your Cell Phone Data.

08 Sunday Dec 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Android Phones, Cell Phones, Criminal Law, Evidence, iPhones, Privacy, Subpoenas

≈ Comments Off on Legal Rules Needed For Police To Allow Access To Your Cell Phone Data.

Tags

Cell Phones, Crime, John Kelly, New Jersey, Police, Susanne Cervenka, T-Mobile, USA TODAY

Cell Data Dumps: A Legally Fuzzy Area, by John Kelly and Susanne Cervenka, USA TODAY

http://tinyurl.com/k9kudm2

The rules governing how police obtain and use data from cellphones is a target on the move, as state legislatures act to protect residents’ privacy and real-life criminal cases wend their way through state and federal courts.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Great Blog on Brief Writing!

25 Monday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Legal Writing

≈ Comments Off on Great Blog on Brief Writing!

Tags

Brief Right, Brief Writing, Court Rules, Joe Billy McDade, Kirby Griffis, Legal Writing

Follow the rules, by Kirby Griffis, Brief Right (with hat tip to Raymond Ward, the [new] legal writer!)

http://briefright.com/follow-the-rules/

 Today’s brief comes from a criminal appeal filed in the Seventh Circuit. A number of things about it attracted my attention. First, it is a brief that the filing lawyer (allegedly) paid a brief writer $5,000 to draft for him. Second, it is an appeal from a decision by the Hon. Chief Judge Joe Billy McDade of the Central District of Illinois, and I don’t believe that Judge McDade is capable of error (though I may be biased). And third, the lawyer who filed the brief was sanctioned for failing to show up for oral argument on it (he said that he was up all night vomiting and didn’t feel well enough to go to court). Though I have great sympathy with feeling ill prior to an oral argument before the Seventh Circuit, it does seem wise to show up anyway when the clerk tells you that you have to.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Resources from the Offices of the United States Attorney . . . and more.

02 Saturday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Discovery, Federal Law, Fraud, References, Research, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Resources from the Offices of the United States Attorney . . . and more.

Tags

Bullying, DOJ, FOIA, Fraud, Freedom of Information Act, National Security, Prescription Drug Abuse, United States Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Victim's Rights

Resources, Offices of the United States Attorney
http://perma.cc/0pU5ocUruhw

FOIA/Privacy Act Requests – “How to” submit FOIA requests
http://perma.cc/0xyPEK7KcCN

FOIA Library – Available to public about office’s operations
http://perma.cc/07JeT6GjPPp

Annual Statistical Reports – Accomplishments for each fiscal year
http://perma.cc/09vkJheop6X

Victim’s Rights Ombudsman – Complaints filed against DOJ employees
http://perma.cc/07fbNaXZcka

United States Attorney’s Bulletin – Legal or technical topics
http://perma.cc/0QdV5c8XtUK

United States Attorney’s Manual – The official handbook
http://perma.cc/0djGLTsgpwy

This is a sample of the great information at this website. See more at Priority Areas (http://perma.cc/0ssbcTres9kl) and Justice 101 (http://perma.cc/0B27rPGVtMV). CCE

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Divorce and Hidden Assets

17 Thursday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Divorce, Family Law, Finding Assets, Fraud, White Collar Crime

≈ Comments Off on Divorce and Hidden Assets

Tags

Assets, Divorce, Financial Institutions, Fraud, Fred Abrams, Money Laundering, White Collar Crime

Divorce & Hidden Assets: Alaskan Plastic Surgeon Accused Of Concealing Millions In Central America, by Fred Abrams, Asset Search Blog
(The first post in the Abram’s “Divorce & Hidden Assets” Series)
http://bit.ly/1gLpR72

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Criminal Defendants Unable to Hire Lawyer Due to Frozen Assets

17 Thursday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law

≈ Comments Off on Criminal Defendants Unable to Hire Lawyer Due to Frozen Assets

Tags

Criminal Law, Criminals, Freezing Assets, Grand Jury, U.S. Supreme Court

Case Pits Freezing Assets Against Hiring Lawyers, by Adam Liptak, New York Times

http://nyti.ms/1gmOIAF

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...
Newer posts →
Follow The Researching Paralegal on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Sign In/Register

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Archives

  • June 2024
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Join 460 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d