Tag Archives: Bloomberg Law

Bloomberg BNA’s New Search Tool For Corporate Transactions.

31 Sunday May 2015

Posted by in Corporate Law, Market Standard, Transactional Law

≈ Comments Off on Bloomberg BNA’s New Search Tool For Corporate Transactions.

Tags

, , , , ,

Bloomberg BNA Launches New Tool For Corporate Transactions, by Barco 2.0: Law Library Reference, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

http://tinyurl.com/qgeeyz5

Bloomberg BNA today announced the launch of Bloomberg Law: Corporate Transactions, a  web-based product that includes a technology-driven drafting workflow tool with its analytics powered by Bloomberg’s financial databases, primary resources, secondary materials and practical guidance. This new offering allows corporate lawyers to know what deal terms are ‘market standard.’ . . .

Continue reading →

Legal Research Tutorials.

05 Saturday Apr 2014

Posted by in Administrative Law, Case Law, Legal Directories, Legal Encyclopedia, Legislation, Legislative History, Mandatory Law, Primary Law, Regulations, Research, Secondary Resources, State Law, Statutes

≈ Comments Off on Legal Research Tutorials.

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Legal Research and Writing Tutorials, Georgetown Law Library

http://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/research/tutorials/lrw.cfm

This link will lead you to these tutorials. -CCE

  • Administrative Law Research Tutorial
  • Bloomberg Law Tutorials
  • Case Law Research Tutorial
  • Legislative History Research Tutorial
  • Secondary Sources Tutorial
  • Statutory Research Tutorial

Why Cases Before the Supreme Court Settle.

23 Saturday Nov 2013

Posted by in Appellate Law, United States Supreme Court

≈ Comments Off on Why Cases Before the Supreme Court Settle.

Tags

, , , , ,

SCOTUS for law students (sponsored by Bloomberg Law): Why cases settle, by Stephen Wermiel, SCOTUS Blog

http://tinyurl.com/o9ohsjb

 If you want an unusual measure of the power of the Supreme Court, consider why parties to a case sometimes (although rarely) settle their dispute after the Justices have agreed to hear the appeal and as oral argument approaches.

In some cases, the answer may simply be fear of losing, but it can also be much more profound: not only the fear of losing, but also a concern that in the process the loss may establish a legal precedent for the nation that one side of the case considers harmful.