Detailed Databases on Fatal Shootings By Law Enforcement.

04 Saturday Jul 2015

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Civil Rights, Excessive Force

≈ Comments Off on Detailed Databases on Fatal Shootings By Law Enforcement.

Tags

beSpacific Blog., Civil Rights, Excessive Force, Law Enforcement, Sabrina I. Pacifici, The Counted, The Guardian, The Washington Post, Wrongful Death

Washington Post Database Collecting Data On Citizen Killings By Police, by Sabrina I. Pacifici, BeSpacific Blog

http://www.bespacific.com/washington-post-database-collecting-data-on-citizen-killings-by-police/

Both The Washington Post and The Guardian have created databases to track numerous details of every fatal shooting by a police officer and other law enforcement in the line of duty in the United States. The Guardian’s project is called “The Counted.” Both the Post and The Counted seek the public’s input, photographs, and videos in an attempt to make their respective databases as comprehensive as possible. -CCE

U.S. Supreme Court’s New Pleading Standards For Qualified Immunity.

27 Tuesday May 2014

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Excessive Force, First Amendment, Governmental Tort Claim Act, Qualified Immunity, United States Supreme Court

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Excessive Force, First Amendment, Iqbal, Qualified Immunity, Supreme Court, Twombly

SCOTUS Decision in Wood v. Moss: Guidance on Pleading Standards?, by Adam Steinman, Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog

http://tinyurl.com/pvgjemj

Today the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Wood v. Moss, with Justice Ginsburg authoring the opinion for the Court. As covered earlier here, Wood v. Moss is a Bivens case brought by plaintiffs who had been protesting against President George W. Bush during his 2004 visit to a restaurant in Oregon. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants, who were secret service agents, violated their First Amendment rights by moving them farther away from the President than a similar group that was expressing support for the President.

In today’s decision, the Court unanimously rules that the defendants are protected by qualified immunity. To most, this conclusion did not come as a surprise. For many proceduralists, however, the case was of particular interest because of its potential effect on pleading standards in the wake of Twombly and Iqbal. . . .