• Home
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

The Researching Paralegal

~ Articles and Research for Legal Professionals

The Researching Paralegal

Category Archives: Trial Tips and Techniques

The Cardinal Rules of Trial Advocacy

05 Tuesday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Admissibility, Closing Argument, Court Rules, Cross-Examination, Direct Examination, Evidence, Making Objections, Opening Argument, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on The Cardinal Rules of Trial Advocacy

Tags

Closing Argument, Evidence, Objections, Opening Argument, Trial Tips & Techniques

Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Trial Procedure and Tactics, by James A. Tanford, Indiana University School Of Law

http://www.perma.cc/0WZumCVR9Ao

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Easy to Avoid PowerPoint Mistakes

05 Tuesday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Legal Technology, PowerPoint, Presentations, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Easy to Avoid PowerPoint Mistakes

Tags

PowerPoint, Trial Tips & Techniques

The 12 Worst PowerPoint Mistakes Litigators Make, by Ken Lopez, The Litigation Consulting Report

http://www.perma.cc/0zDFaj4DRK4

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

OSHA First Impression Ruling on “Entreprise-Wide” Abatement Theory of Liability

05 Tuesday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Employment Law, Trial Tips and Techniques, Workers' Compensation

≈ Comments Off on OSHA First Impression Ruling on “Entreprise-Wide” Abatement Theory of Liability

Tags

Administrative law judge, Enterprise-wide relief, OSHA, OSHRC, Precedent

Judge Rejects OSHA’s “Enterprise-Wide” Relief Theory, by Stephen Yohay, EHS OutLoud Blog

http://www.perma.cc/0SeaMZWf1hp

In what apparently is a case of first impression, an administrative law judge (ALJ) of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) recently decided that the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) does not authorize OSHRC to order so-called “enterprise-wide” abatement. Under that theory of liability, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains that when a violation is proven at an employer’s worksite, OSHRC has the statutory authority to require that employer to abate the same or similar hazards at its other worksites that were not the subject of the litigated citation.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

“Supervisor” Defined by U.S. Supreme Court

04 Monday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Employment Law, Harassment, Race Discrimination, Trial Tips and Techniques, United States Supreme Court

≈ Comments Off on “Supervisor” Defined by U.S. Supreme Court

Tags

Discrimination, Harassment, Supervisor, Title VII, United States Supreme Court

Supreme Court refines Title VII standards, by Kevin B. Leblang and Robert N. Holtzman, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

http://bit.ly/1a45PkL

On June 24 2013 the US Supreme Court handed down opinions in two cases refining the standards applicable to claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. First, the court ruled that only employees with the authority to hire, fire or promote the alleged victim will be considered supervisors for purposes of Title VII harassment suits. Second, the Supreme Court applied a strict and employer-friendly causation standard to Title VII retaliation claims.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

What do you think about the Second Circuit’s removal of Judge Shira Scheindlin?

02 Saturday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Appellate Law, Case Law, Court Rules, Federal District Court Rules, Federal Law, Legal Ethics, Research, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on What do you think about the Second Circuit’s removal of Judge Shira Scheindlin?

Tags

New York City Police Department, Removal of federal judge, Shira Scheindlin, Stop-and-frisk program, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

As always, Judge Kopf asks an interesting question. CCE

RGK's avatarHercules and the umpire.

Judge Scheindlin is a New York federal trial judge who has taken senior status.* She was handling high profile cases involving New York’s “stop and frisk” practices. She issued an opinion providing remedial relief and an injunction to the folks who were challenging the police department’s practices, and up the case went to the Second Circuit. On Thursday, without ruling on the merits of the appeal, and acting on its own without a request from the appellants, the Second Circuit removed Scheindlin.  The Court stated that the trial judge had violated the Code of Conduct and failed in her responsibility to uphold the appearance of impartiality (1) because of her statements to the parties regarding “related” cases and (2) because of interviews she gave to the media. The Second Circuit’s short opinion is here. Liberal legal commentators exploded in outrage. See, for example, here and here. The…

View original post 46 more words

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Resources from the Offices of the United States Attorney . . . and more.

02 Saturday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Criminal Law, Discovery, Federal Law, Fraud, References, Research, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Resources from the Offices of the United States Attorney . . . and more.

Tags

Bullying, DOJ, FOIA, Fraud, Freedom of Information Act, National Security, Prescription Drug Abuse, United States Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Victim's Rights

Resources, Offices of the United States Attorney
http://perma.cc/0pU5ocUruhw

FOIA/Privacy Act Requests – “How to” submit FOIA requests
http://perma.cc/0xyPEK7KcCN

FOIA Library – Available to public about office’s operations
http://perma.cc/07JeT6GjPPp

Annual Statistical Reports – Accomplishments for each fiscal year
http://perma.cc/09vkJheop6X

Victim’s Rights Ombudsman – Complaints filed against DOJ employees
http://perma.cc/07fbNaXZcka

United States Attorney’s Bulletin – Legal or technical topics
http://perma.cc/0QdV5c8XtUK

United States Attorney’s Manual – The official handbook
http://perma.cc/0djGLTsgpwy

This is a sample of the great information at this website. See more at Priority Areas (http://perma.cc/0ssbcTres9kl) and Justice 101 (http://perma.cc/0B27rPGVtMV). CCE

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

American Jury System – The Optimal Jury Trial Videos

01 Friday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Experts, Jury Instructions, Jury Selection, Trial Tips and Techniques, Voir Dire

≈ Comments Off on American Jury System – The Optimal Jury Trial Videos

Tags

American Jury Section, Judges, Jury, Jury instructions, Jury Selection, Jury trial

Favorite Thing: American Jury System – The Optimal Jury Trial Videos, submitted by Susie Macpherson of NJP Litigation Consulting, ASTC Member Trial Consultants from The Jury Expert
http://perma.cc/0Z3TkwVQy6Z

Impressive collection of resources for judges and attorneys. CCE

These videos are a great resource for attorneys and judges who want to investigate any of these topics, or for those who need ‘hands on’ examples to encourage other judges and attorneys to implement new procedures.”

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

During Trial, Court Should Have Admonished Jury Not to Google Plaintiff’s Lawyer Rather than Ordering Removal of Verdict Successes from Attorney’s Website

01 Friday Nov 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in First Amendment, Jury Instructions, Law Firm Web Sites, Law Office Management, Legal Ethics, Marketing, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on During Trial, Court Should Have Admonished Jury Not to Google Plaintiff’s Lawyer Rather than Ordering Removal of Verdict Successes from Attorney’s Website

Tags

Censorship, First Amendment, Jury instructions, Law Firm Websites

Jurors Might Google Law Firm’s Website, but Judge Can’t Censor It During Trial, by Scott Graham, The Recorder (with hat tip to Allen Mihecoby, CLAS, RP® on LinkedIn)

http://perma.cc/0UvXPVmc3Fg

[T]the decision sets new boundaries in an area of increasing concern for trial attorneys and judges: the balance between attorney free speech rights and potential jury contamination in a networked world.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

A Return to Civility?

28 Monday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on A Return to Civility?

Tags

Above the Law, Brian Tannebaum, Trial Tips and Techniques

The Practice: Dealing with Threatening, Demanding Opposing Counsel, by Brian Tannebaum, Above the Law Blog

http://perma.cc/0qDRXkZERqq

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Trial Technique Courtroom Tips

25 Friday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Direct Examination, Experts, Jury Selection, Legal Technology, Trial Tips and Techniques, Witness Preparation

≈ Comments Off on Trial Technique Courtroom Tips

Tags

Experts, Jury Selection, Legal Technology, Trial Tips & Techniques, Witness Preparation

TRIAL TECHNIQUES: What lawyers should (and shouldn’t) worry about in the courtroom, by Alexandra Rudolph, WisLawJournal.com
http://bit.ly/uDFH17

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Proposed Federal Rules Narrow Discovery and Spur Cooperation Between the Parties

24 Thursday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Court Rules, Discovery, E-Discovery, Evidence, Requests for Production, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Proposed Federal Rules Narrow Discovery and Spur Cooperation Between the Parties

Tags

Discovery, Duke Rules, E-Discovery, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

The Duke Rules Ahead: Part 1 Rule Amendments Will Narrow Discovery and Spur Cooperation, by James Kurz, EDVAUpdate, Redmon, Peyton & Braswell, LLP
http://bit.ly/1c1gVH4

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Famous Trials

24 Thursday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Famous Trials

Tags

Douglas Linder, Trial

Famous Trials, by Douglas O. Linder, Professor of Law (Seminar in Famous Trials 199-2013©), University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) School of Law
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/ftrials.htm

Link to “More Famous Trials” at bottom of page. (This is an educational and non-commercial site maintained at the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School.)

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Two Trial Masters, F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman, Share Tips on Cross-Examination

23 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Cross-Examination, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Two Trial Masters, F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman, Share Tips on Cross-Examination

Tags

Cross-Examination, F. Lee Bailey, Kenneth Fishman, Robert Ambrogi, Trial Tips and Techniques

F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman on Excellence in Cross-Examination, by Robert Ambrogi, Robert Ambrogi’s LawSites
http://bit.ly/17fFhza

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

The “Litigation Explosion” is a Myth

23 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Personal Injury, Settlement

≈ Comments Off on The “Litigation Explosion” is a Myth

Tags

Greg Haubrich, Juries, Litigation, McDonald's, Personal Injury, Settlement

Greg H. Haubrich, Senior Trial Lawyer at Foshee & Yafee, explains why he recommended — and his client accepted — a settlement agreement that will barely pay her medical bills.

gregh1952's avatarThe Haubrich Law Firm, P.C.

The Myth of the “Litigation Explosion”   

A lawyer wears two hats:  Advocate, and counselor.  As advocate, my duty is to fight for you hard as hell, tooth and nails; to be the knight in shining armor charging into the Valley of Death.  As counselor, I must give you the news and help you realistically evaluate your odds so that you can make well-informed decisions regarding basic questions in your case: especially, whether to accept a settlement offer.

Today I recommended — and my client accepted — a settlement agreement that will barely pay her medical bills.   Why?

The first reason is that it is hard to understand how a person can be seriously injured in a collision when there is not a lot of visible crash damage to their vehicle.  Science does not support the idea that crash damage correlates to injury.  In fact, it is established that deaths sometimes…

View original post 968 more words

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Experts, Admissibility, and Rule 705

22 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Admissibility, Court Rules, Evidence, Expert Witnesses, Forensic Evidence, Trial Tips and Techniques, Voir Dire

≈ Comments Off on Experts, Admissibility, and Rule 705

Tags

Admissibility, Evidence, Expert Opinion, Expert Witness, Rule 705, Voir Dire

Who Made You The Expert?: Rule 705 & The Admissibility of Underlying Facts or Data, by Evidence ProfBlogger, EvidenceProfBlog
http://bit.ly/1a085YM

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Avoiding a Defense Motion for Nonsuit in Opening Argument

19 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Opening Argument, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Avoiding a Defense Motion for Nonsuit in Opening Argument

Tags

Defense Counsel, Motions, NonSuit, Opening Argument, Plaintiff's Counsel, Trial Tips and Techniques

Avoiding the Dreaded Defense Motion for Nonsuit, by Julie Brook, CEBblog
http://bit.ly/1gTe7zD

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Comprehensive Discussion of Trial Procedure and Techniques

19 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Closing Argument, Cross-Examination, Direct Examination, Evidence, Judges, Jury Selection, Making Objections, Opening Argument, Trial Notebooks, Trial Tips and Techniques

≈ Comments Off on Comprehensive Discussion of Trial Procedure and Techniques

Tags

Closing Argument, Cross-Examination, Direct Examination, Indiana University School of Law, James A. Tanford, Jury Selection, Objections, Opening Argument, Trial Notebooks, Trial Tips and Techniques

Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Trial Procedure And Tactics, by James A. Tanford, Indiana University School of Law
http://www.law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/web/reference/basictactics.html

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Voir Dire Tips from Gerry Spence

16 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Voir Dire

≈ Comments Off on Voir Dire Tips from Gerry Spence

Tags

Civil Procedure, Gerry Spence, Litigation Tips & Techniques, Voir Dire

Gerry Spence: Voir Dire Example, by Evan Schaeffer, The Trial Practice Tips Weblog(from Paul Luvera at Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips: ““Gerry Spence Voir Dire Questions.”)

http://bit.ly/1g1yY0l

 

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...

Oral Argument of Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action

16 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Celia C. Elwell, RP in Affirmative Action, Employment Law, Oral Argument

≈ Comments Off on Oral Argument of Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action

Tags

Affirmative Action, Appellate Law, Employment Law, Oral Argument

Argument recap: Figuring out Kennedy – Again, posted by Lyle Denniston, SCOTUSblog
http://bit.ly/1bUHO3q


Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Tumblr
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
Like Loading...
Newer posts →
Follow The Researching Paralegal on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Sign In/Register

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Archives

  • June 2024
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…

Recent Comments

lawyersonia's avatarlawyersonia on In Custodia Legis – Lega…
Eric Voigt's avatarEric Voigt on Top 20 Paralegal Blogs, Websit…
profvoigt's avatarprofvoigt on Research Guides in Focus – Mun…
Make Your PDF Docume… on Make Your PDF Document Edit-Pr…
madlaw291282999's avatarmadlaw291282999 on Using Hyperbole -Are You Riski…
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Join 460 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Researching Paralegal
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d