The Meaning Of “Intellectual Property,” by Dennis Crouch’s Patently-O Blog
Energy Recovery, Inc. v. Hauge (Fed. Cir. 2014) 13-1515.Opinion.3-18-2014.1– Panel: Rader, Reyna, and Wallach (author).
At the heart of this case lies the question of ‘what is intellectual property?’ Here, the answer has more than philosophical implications: a finding of contempt hinges on it.
The Researching Paralegal 
Reblogged this on Tran Law Firm LLP and commented:
This is a great article about a recent important Fed Cir. decision. Often times when a key employee leaves a technology company, issues may arise when the former employee use of “intellectual property” at a subsequent job. In Energy Recovery, the Fed Cir sheds some light on how they define “intellectual property”.
LikeLike